SantaFebuff
That's So Trainz Forum
DISREGUARD: Okay, TS2009... not the best. However, they were testing a few things out. It looked incredibly different in appearance and assets. Not stable. :n:
Okay, TS2010... not the best. Speedtree is a dud. We all know that one. If you hit 100mph, the tree look like there dancing...probably. Oh, and the download link is having a few problems. Maybe unstable.:n:
...how about the pluses?
Okay, TS2009...content is out. It is detailed, it has great upgrades. The new cab is amazing. So, yes, the sound sucks. It's good sound, but it's overkilled by thousands of assets having it. Even worse is the asset doesn't have an EMD 645 prime mover. However, the SD40-2 does. The track is great. I was amazed a little computer my uncle had it in was under the minimum requirements barely and I could load coal into hoppers with that SD40-2 for Union Pacific and not worry about glitches. The track, nice. You can see so much, it's an amazing improvement. I don't care how deep the texture is on MP standard track, high detail like TS2009 will win. Even www.uslw.net 's track is detailed like that, and I love it. :Y:
Okay, TS2010...They upgraded more! More and more default content is amazingly detailed. I'm sure they expanded it. Honestly, if I was to have a choice, TS2010 or TC 1&2, I would chose TS2010. Why? Why not. This is supposed to be what TS2009 was. They have a problem, and if you read, there's a fix being work on. It's likely to be better, and if it's not, that's okay. Every thing is looking detailed, except the trees.:Y:
Come on guys, Auran would never wrong us. They are trying to get with the modern program of high detail in little packages. They are trying to detail things, let them work it out. We should support...not complain. Maybe offer friendly advice and even let them know our opinion on it. Yes, goods and bad may be offered, but think improvement. :clap:
Cheers,
Joshua
Okay, TS2010... not the best. Speedtree is a dud. We all know that one. If you hit 100mph, the tree look like there dancing...probably. Oh, and the download link is having a few problems. Maybe unstable.:n:
...how about the pluses?
Okay, TS2009...content is out. It is detailed, it has great upgrades. The new cab is amazing. So, yes, the sound sucks. It's good sound, but it's overkilled by thousands of assets having it. Even worse is the asset doesn't have an EMD 645 prime mover. However, the SD40-2 does. The track is great. I was amazed a little computer my uncle had it in was under the minimum requirements barely and I could load coal into hoppers with that SD40-2 for Union Pacific and not worry about glitches. The track, nice. You can see so much, it's an amazing improvement. I don't care how deep the texture is on MP standard track, high detail like TS2009 will win. Even www.uslw.net 's track is detailed like that, and I love it. :Y:
Okay, TS2010...They upgraded more! More and more default content is amazingly detailed. I'm sure they expanded it. Honestly, if I was to have a choice, TS2010 or TC 1&2, I would chose TS2010. Why? Why not. This is supposed to be what TS2009 was. They have a problem, and if you read, there's a fix being work on. It's likely to be better, and if it's not, that's okay. Every thing is looking detailed, except the trees.:Y:
Come on guys, Auran would never wrong us. They are trying to get with the modern program of high detail in little packages. They are trying to detail things, let them work it out. We should support...not complain. Maybe offer friendly advice and even let them know our opinion on it. Yes, goods and bad may be offered, but think improvement. :clap:
Cheers,
Joshua
Last edited: