This is STEAM

bl4882

New member
Just wanted to share Classic Trains' photo of the day. This is what I call steam. Beautiful NKP Berkshire. http://ctr.trains.com/ Should be up all weekend, but don't waste time. Grab it for wallpaper. :D

Bernie

PS: Sodden thought, I wonder what the EPA would have to say if this took place today?

Bernie
 
Last edited:
I actually have been asked by a customer once, if the EPA had a problem with our steam locomotive's emissions. It was near a boiler wash, so we had to fire a little dirty to make heat, yay carbon buildup. Anyway, I told them to look at the highway, I-70 which was literally the replacement for our railroad. I told them in 1 hour, that highway produces more pollution then our train does all day.


A few old steamers won't affect global warming as much as a few millions cars......plain and simple.
 
Hi Klinger:

When I rode the Durango & Silverton about 10 years ago I asked the fireman about the EPA's "take" on them burning coal. Reply was the EPA wasn't particulary concerned as they have a source of low sulfer coal. Your right on about the comparison to any interstate highway. If the EPA really wants to crack down on coal emissions they need to do so on coal powered power plants. They must put out more emissions in one hour then your loco does in a year, lol.

Ben
 
Hi,

You are adressing an interesting issue. Even older coal fired electric power plants did have filters to minimize emissions. Actually it was the increasing size of electric power plants which drove the development of dust filters as well as technologies to prevent sulphorous and nitrogenous emission. Because of the large size of the plants, size and weight of the filters and washer towers was never an issue. The technology has been reached a stage, that modern state of the art power plants practically do not emit anything but carbon dioxide and water.

With museum life steam trains, the smell of coal smoke is part of the experience, anyhow. Since they are usually operating during weekends and holidays only, overall amounts of pollutants emitted are minimal. Anyhow, most museum trains are operated in remote areas where pollution levels are generally low.

Accordingly, there should be little reason for concern by regulatory agencies. Nevertheless, in the eastern states of Germany there are still a number of narrow gauge lines operating steam trains regularly for touristic reasons. Many of their locomotives were converted to burn the light heating fuel used by household furnaces. The same applies to a number of rack and pinion steam locomotives, recently built to old plans but using modern (e.g. welding) technologies to continue operation of touristic rack and pinion lines in the austrian and swiss alps as the old original locomotives were just too much worn out.
Nitpicking by overzealous environmentalists has therefore not had much impact on the operation of steam trains. Let us hope it stay that way.

I should add that the motive for switching to fuel oil was not only the wish to reduce emission of pollutants but also the easier handling of boilers operated by liquid fuel as well as cost and increasing difficulties in obtaining locomotive coal.

Cheers,

Konni
 
Last edited:
Back
Top