sorry this is in the wrong thread but I KNEW IT the cause of the spain crash

In Trainz such disaster would never happen.

I can run train with speed of 200 mph over an arc with radius of 150 feet and it sticks to the tracks like glue. This is why Trainz is such a good simulator.
 
just as me and uncle who is an Amtrak worker he was talking on the phone but get this he was bragging to his friend his speed of 159 kph when it was 90 on the curve http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/30/francisco-jose-garzon-amo-phone-spain-train-crash_n_3676913.html?utm_hp_ref=world&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl3|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D351326

Strange that, because according to the black box, he was talking to railway officials, NOT his "freind".


A statement released by the court said Mr Amo had been talking on his work phone to an official of national rail company Renfe while apparently consulting a paper document at the time of the crash.
http://news.sky.com/story/1122326/spain-train-crash-hearing-driver-on-phone
 
oh ya wasn't it a college I might be \wrong I only did a quick read through this story (sorry if my spellcheck did not spell correctly):hehe:
 
Hi Kenny and everybody.
Kenny, it could be that this phone call (if it actually took place) may alleviate the driver from some of the responsibility for this accident. If the control room personnel initiated the phone call then they may well have to carry quite a high percentage of the responsibility for what happened while that call was taking place.

With highly sophisticated modern tracking systems for commercial vehicles (and I would think railway power cars were no different) the control room personnel known as traffic controllers in Britain would have been well aware of exactly where the train was and if it was stationary or travelling when they initiated the call to the driver. There probably would be a standing instruction to all train crew to respond immediately to any communication from the control centre.

Should the foregoing be correct the driver may well argue that he was distracted in his concentration by the telephone call while controlling the train and it was this that was a large contributing factor in the accident. Therefore the telephone call (if there was any) may go in part to alleviating at least a considerable percentage of his responsibility for this tragedy.

I draw evidence for the above on a case my own company was involved in where an HGV driver crossed a junction and collided with a car. The driver had disciplinary action taken against him by his employers and was dismissed. At the industrial tribunal which followed the driver advised that his cab phone started to ring just as he was approaching the junction and although he did not answer it distracted his concentration enough for him to have made the mistake at the junction. He also argued that as the company tracking system allowed the traffic controllers to have sufficient knowledge to know he was driving at the time they initiated the call, they should not in the interest of safety have tried to contact him at that time.

The driver won the case at the tribunal and received a substantial amount in compensation.
Bill

Posted from the Manchester to Plymouth HST service on approach to Bristol @ 21:05
 
Back
Top