Japan

[steve123]

Albert Einstein could he have been a theoretical physicist because he had really no equipment to prove his theories did he ,i wonder if you would have said that Albert Einstein was only a theoretical physicist so take no notice of him,
there is nothing that is impossible in this world it is your ability to be able to imagine it because one day in time the mathematical equation will be there to create it.
steve

 

[steve123]

David Icke was he involed with that Wako texes stand off

 

[jadebullet]

DR.Michio Kaku stated about 6 months ago on TV in the US that in 2012 the sun will unleash solar flares that could change the way we live and be damaging to the earth magnetic fields.

1st part: Thank you captain obvious. We have known for quite some time that the Sun was going to enter a time of great activity. Why? Because it is on a cycle. Sunspots, flares, ect, they are all part of the solar cycle. It would be a bad thing if they weren't happening, as it would be the sign of the beginning of the end of our sun. (Very slow death btw.) As it is, the active period is actually late by 2 years. It was supposed to start in 2008, but only really started in 2010.

Second part: Yes, it could disrupt satellite communication, as well as radio frequencies and cell phones, normal sunspot activity stuff. But to say that it will damage the magnetic field is just dumb. There might be a slight flux, but unless these flares are going to slow the Earth's rotation, the field will be just as strong as before.

The proof you seek is that all the planets are heating up not just ours as space probes have proven by images of eruptions,

Mercury: Dead planet. No volcanic activity.
Venus: Active Planet. High volcanic activity. Pancake Volcanoes
Earth: Active planet. Unique tectonic plates. Should not be able to support life at location with sun type. High magnetic field allows this. Volcanic activity.
Mars: Dead planet. Evidence of water on surface. Water found in southern pole underground. (Frozen.)
Asteroid belt: We got rocks yo!
Jupiter: Gas Giant. High storm activity. No solid mass, thus no volcanos
Saturn: Gas giant. Rings formed by pulverized moon. No solid mass.
Neptune: Gas giant. Has storms, but much less than Jupiter. Methane gives it its blue color.
Uranus: Same as Neptune.
Pluto: Made of ice. Downrated to Dwarf planet when other bodies that would have counted as planets were found past Pluto.


As for the moons. None have Volcanic activity as none are large enough to have a core. Titan is one of the exceptions, though it rains sulfuric acid there. Europa is ice, but has water underneath that might contain life.


TL;DR Your argument is invalid as most planets do not support volcanic activity, or even have a solid mass.


As for the other planets heating up. Nope, complete BS. Turns out, we can't really measure that accurately without going onto the surface itself. Plus, all of the planets take to long to get to and beam info back to get an accurate and timely reading about what they are doing. Mars takes years, and is the only planet that we can land stuff on. We can land stuff on moons though.


Now, on a more interesting note. We might have a long degree of fully lit day and night thanks to a supernova that astronomers believe will be reaching us in 2012. Day will be slightly brighter, and night will be like dusk.

 

[al_sa]

Jade the moon Io has volcanic activity probably it's motherplanet's tidal(gravity)waves. But still we have some planet's magnetic pole reversal and the Pioneer effect to explain yet. And those pesky greet beings stealing the snow in my garden now

 

[steve123]

the simple answer is you guys are right i am wrong but when and if shxt hits the fan ,you all know what i will say and if i am wrong i will be man enough to state it.time will tell
steve
PS I hope my spelling and grammar are right for you i don't wish to be corrected by someone so perfect
steve

 

[steve123]

I hope your spelling and grammar are right al.sa,dont tell Jade that the moon IO has volcanic activity his in his own happy box dont make him come out
again

 

[steve123]

If your looking up IO Jade it comes under I just thought id help you

 

[StorkNest]

So this is the, "Japan in Space," thread?:hehe:

1st part: Thank you captain obvious.

????

Jupiter: Gas Giant. High storm activity. No solid mass, thus no volcanos
Saturn: Gas giant. Rings formed by pulverized moon. No solid mass.
Neptune: Gas giant. Has storms, but much less than Jupiter. Methane gives it its blue color.
Uranus: Same as Neptune.
Pluto: Made of ice. Downrated to Dwarf planet when other bodies that would have counted as planets were found past Pluto.

As for the moons. None have Volcanic activity as none are large enough to have a core. Titan is one of the exceptions, though it rains sulfuric acid there. Europa is ice, but has water underneath that might contain life.

TL;DR Your argument is invalid as most planets do not support volcanic activity, or even have a solid mass.

Gas Giants have solid mass, it is so deep beneath the gas that on the way down, the pressure would break anything we can make and that doesn't count possible liquid layers or loose solid particles in the atmosphere. All those gases have to be held together by and around something, gas just doesn't form a planet like shape on its own and you need some type of solid mass to get things like gravity.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/g/gas_giant.htm

Volcanic activity happens in more places than you think.
http://geology.com/articles/active-volcanoes-solar-system.shtml
Since some locations have not been thoroughly looked at, it is too premature to say there is no other activity.

 

[paul502]

David Icke was he involed with that Wako texes stand off

He is a British conspiracy nutter who is very clever at manipulating the weak minded & gullible. DR.Michio Kaku gets a mention on his website, give it a look am sure you will have hours of fun http://www.davidicke.com/. Personally i detest the man, having a friend who is so obsessed with the guys rantings, that he lost his marriage, job ,children, & self respect. If i was you i would keep well away from such nutcase theories..

 

[CaptEngland]

You know, you can download a nuclear waste train for this and other sims?

At least this information is related to this forum.

Goodnight!

CaptEngland :mop:

 

[steve123]

Good night CaptEngland i hope you have sweet dreams on Arsenal winning
the FA Cup, go Arsenal

 

[steve123]

How about they send the men in to fix the nuclear power plants that have designed them and call them safe,maybe then they would take more care in designing fail-safe systems
this problem seems to be getting worse,,there are rumors about moving 12 million people from Tokyo is that even possible, people from all countries are being told to leave,,not good at all .
steve

 

[PerRock]

1st part: Thank you captain obvious. We have known for quite some time that the Sun was going to enter a time of great activity. Why? Because it is on a cycle. Sunspots, flares, ect, they are all part of the solar cycle. It would be a bad thing if they weren't happening, as it would be the sign of the beginning of the end of our sun. (Very slow death btw.) As it is, the active period is actually late by 2 years. It was supposed to start in 2008, but only really started in 2010.

Second part: Yes, it could disrupt satellite communication, as well as radio frequencies and cell phones, normal sunspot activity stuff. But to say that it will damage the magnetic field is just dumb. There might be a slight flux, but unless these flares are going to slow the Earth's rotation, the field will be just as strong as before.




Mercury: Dead planet. No volcanic activity.
Venus: Active Planet. High volcanic activity. Pancake Volcanoes
Earth: Active planet. Unique tectonic plates. Should not be able to support life at location with sun type. High magnetic field allows this. Volcanic activity.
Mars: Dead planet. Evidence of water on surface. Water found in southern pole underground. (Frozen.)
Asteroid belt: We got rocks yo!
Jupiter: Gas Giant. High storm activity. No solid mass, thus no volcanos
Saturn: Gas giant. Rings formed by pulverized moon. No solid mass.
Neptune: Gas giant. Has storms, but much less than Jupiter. Methane gives it its blue color.
Uranus: Same as Neptune.
Pluto: Made of ice. Downrated to Dwarf planet when other bodies that would have counted as planets were found past Pluto.


As for the moons. None have Volcanic activity as none are large enough to have a core. Titan is one of the exceptions, though it rains sulfuric acid there. Europa is ice, but has water underneath that might contain life.


TL;DR Your argument is invalid as most planets do not support volcanic activity, or even have a solid mass.


As for the other planets heating up. Nope, complete BS. Turns out, we can't really measure that accurately without going onto the surface itself. Plus, all of the planets take to long to get to and beam info back to get an accurate and timely reading about what they are doing. Mars takes years, and is the only planet that we can land stuff on. We can land stuff on moons though.


Now, on a more interesting note. We might have a long degree of fully lit day and night thanks to a supernova that astronomers believe will be reaching us in 2012. Day will be slightly brighter, and night will be like dusk.

So this is the, "Japan in Space," thread?:hehe:


????


Gas Giants have solid mass, it is so deep beneath the gas that on the way down, the pressure would break anything we can make and that doesn't count possible liquid layers or loose solid particles in the atmosphere. All those gases have to be held together by and around something, gas just doesn't form a planet like shape on its own and you need some type of solid mass to get things like gravity.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/g/gas_giant.htm

Volcanic activity happens in more places than you think.
http://geology.com/articles/active-volcanoes-solar-system.shtml
Since some locations have not been thoroughly looked at, it is too premature to say there is no other activity.

I believe most of the dwarf planets that caused Pluto to be downgraded were found in the Asteroid belt, not beyond pluto.

peter

 

[Paulsw2]

Well I came on these forums today hoping to find out a bit more about trains, but instead, thanks to this thread I've discovered,

Global Warming does not exist. Period.

the pulling of the milkyway centre black hole and our sun is causing friction within this solar systum we all learnt about friction at school ,which causes heat, in this case within a planets core, causing earthquake and eroptions...

Now I feel enlightened! :hehe:

Paul

 

[Thad09]

I feel like I need to get involved here. Here are my words
1) Dose anybody realize that the water used in the reactors is not normal water? Its water with an extra Hydrogen Ion or something like that.
2) The CO2 argument: ITS BOTH BIOLOGY AND CHEMESTRY YOU FOOLS!
3) The Black Hole issue: It wont gobble up Earth for the next hundred something billion years! Don't worry, we all will be long dead then!
4) Steve, LEARN SOME GRAMMAR! Its hard enough trying to understand your ideas and the grammar dosent help. Something more to learn in school. It might sound harsh, yet its true, and I apologize about it.

The Thad Has Spoken.

 

[steve123]

Thank you Thad09 for pointing out that my spelling and grammar sucked how ever it had been stated before in this thread and the reason why had also been stated,
however i do welcome constructive criticism.
I didn't stated a black holes was going to eat us up that seems to be your words
3) The Black Hole issue: It wont gobble up Earth for the next hundred something billion years! Don't worry, we all will be long dead then!

All i said was that the black hole could be placing forces on our solar system,
due to passing across the face of the black hole by our solar system and in turn causing friction within the planets core producing heat then causing continental plate shifting also due to plate thinning which could cause these events in Japan.
steve

 

[NikkiA]

I feel like I need to get involved here. Here are my words
1) Dose anybody realize that the water used in the reactors is not normal water? Its water with an extra Hydrogen Ion or something like that.

Mostly, it's seawater with boron mixed in. If you use regular (non-boron-ated) water (fresh or sea) it can actually make matters worse (in terms of neutron emission) with this kind of reactor.

2) The CO2 argument: ITS BOTH BIOLOGY AND CHEMESTRY YOU FOOLS!
3) The Black Hole issue: It wont gobble up Earth for the next hundred something billion years! Don't worry, we all will be long dead then!

The galactic core black hole isn't even going to gobble up earth, ever, unless we're absolutely wrong about the expand-contract theory of the universe (the expand-contract theory is currently dismissed as being unlikely, and the current theory is that the universe will expand until it all thins out to almost nothing in heath-death in about 10^27 years). And even then, it wouldn't matter because the earth, and all life in this galaxy, would be torn apart by the compression long before we got near the galactic core. That would be in 10 trillion years or so, if the expand-contract theory is right. Before then we have to deal with the sun dying in ~4 billion years, and our galaxy colliding with the Andromeda galaxy in about 3-5 billion years. If mankind somehow lives past that, we'll have other problems to look forward to, but surviving the death of Sol would mean we'd have some technology to move around. Surviving the heath-death of the universe is impossible, however.

Sol's normal route around the galaxy takes it no-where near any black holes, it has made the trip around the whole perimeter of the galaxy several times - it takes roughly 250 million years, and since the solar system has been here 4 billion, you can work out how many times we've gone 'all the way around'.

 

[NikkiA]

Thank you Thad09 for pointing out that my spelling and grammar sucked how ever it had been stated before in this thread and the reason why had also been stated,
however i do welcome constructive criticism.
I didn't stated a black holes was going to eat us up that seems to be your words
3) The Black Hole issue: It wont gobble up Earth for the next hundred something billion years! Don't worry, we all will be long dead then!

All i said was that the black hole could be placing forces on our solar system,
due to passing across the face of the black hole by our solar system and in turn causing friction within the planets core producing heat then causing continental plate shifting also due to plate thinning which could cause these events in Japan.
steve

Steve, we are 26,000 light years, that is 1.52840995 × 10^17 miles from the center of the galaxy, trust me, it isn't affecting us negatively. (although without the core black hole we'd probably not be orbiting the galactic core where we are...

There is also 'The Great Attractor' that is between 150 million and 250 million light years away, which is responsible for the movement of the galaxies, do you have a conspiracy theory about how that is going to destroy us all next week, too?

Edit:

Oh, and black holes don't have 'faces', that's a popular misconception due to the terrible way black holes are visualised as a funnel-like structure in popular media. Their attraction is spherical, and you will see the same forces from any angle to them. There are great accurate (within the limits of our understanding) visualisations of how black holes would appear, on the web, if you are interested in actually learning.

 

[steve123]

Once more another person stating something that i did not state ,
NikkiA statement
do you have a conspiracy theory about how that is going to destroy us all next week, too

WHY do you people add and subtract to what is said you only make a fool out of yourself while trying to make one out of me , if you dont like what i have stated then go to a different thread pretty simple

And also if the black hole had no bearing on us because of the 'The Great Attractor' then your theory is stuffed right there,because you stated...
(although without the core black hole we'd probably not be orbiting the galactic core where we are.

So yes it does affect us ever so slight, if it can affect us one way why not another , so gently that nobody understands why its getting hotter .
steve

 

[StorkNest]

Well I came on these forums today hoping to find out a bit more about trains, but instead, thanks to this thread I've discovered,

Now I feel enlightened! :hehe:

Paul

But we are discussing trains!

Clearly global warming is why more AC units are needed on trains.

And black holes are why you cannot get enough power out of your locomotives.

See?:hehe: