Hey @AlexMaria since the Chuo Line Rapid is getting First Class green cars, I was woundering if you can make a reskin of it
Sure, i may try.
Nice

. Will be needed I think because that is a heavily congested line.
The Chuo Line is NOW getting the green cars?!! Ridership must've skyrocketed fast over the years.
Actually, ridership on the Chuo Line has been stable for almost 20-25 years now. The reason why the Green Cars may be introduced to the Chuo Line is entirely different: it is to provide competition against Keio Railway's Keio Liner service, wich started operations in 2017.
Introducing Green Cars on the Chuo Line might actually be harmful to the line's capacity: as it is, the Chuo Line is an already well overcrowded line - the addition of two green cars will only increase dwelling time, and subsequently reduce possible frequency and increase running times, wich can lead to a worsening of the overcrowding.
Furthermore, the Green Cars on the Chuo Line might actually be useless: the line is only 53Km long (Tokyo to Takao), a distance wich is covered in about 30 minutes by a rapid train.
The purpose of green cars is to provide sitting places on long commuter runs, where standing for an hour or more becomes impractical: for comparison all the services using green cars as of today (the Shonan-Shinjuku/Takasaki/Utsunomiya Line ones, the Tokaido/Ueno-Tokyo Line ones, the Joban/Tohoku Main Line ones and the Yokosuka/Sobu Line ones) all run a distance of atleast 100Km, with some even reaching up to 120/130Km and running times well above one hour (some even near two).
If i'd were JR East, i'd still lenghten the Chuo Line platform to 12-cars capacity, but just for two more "conventional" commuter cars. JR East had already operated reserved-seating rapid services designed for commuters in the form of the "Chuo Liner" services (discontinued in 2019 and replaced by the "Hachioji" Limited Express service). A sensible thing to do might have been to maintain such services instead of undergoing all these costly, lenghty and possibly harmful modifications.
Found this
very interesting video. Really worth your time if you have travelled on Tokyo's Yamanote line or planning to do so at the future. Had to share.

.
Thanks for sharing; the video is surely informative, altough i did dislike the narrator's voice (but that's just my opinion).
I'd like to add a few things more regarding the 1967 Shinjuku Tanker explosion (wich was carrying jet fuel for USAF's arcrafts based at the Tachikawa Air Base): as a result of the accident, freight trains carrying dangerous goods (from fuel to chemical products and beyond) were immediately banned from running in central Tokyo and outlying areas, leading to the construction of the very important Musashino freight bypass line. The ban is still in effect as of today, and the only freight trains permitted to run in central Tokyo are a couple of very-early-morning or very-late-evening container trains, wich use the Yamanote Freight Line (wich is normally used by Saikyo and Shonan-Shinjuku Line trains) between Osaki and Ikebukuro in the brief "time window" between the end of nighttime maintainance works and the start of the morning rush-hour.
Another thing i'd like to add that wasn't mentioned in the video is the 1972 Nippori station accident, wich led to the introduction of the ATC system on the Yamanote and the Keihin-Tohoku Line. The incident happened due to fog and a signal malfunction, with a Yamanote Line 103 Series set rear-ending a Keihin-Tohoku Line* set of the same type stopped at Nippori Station at about 20Km/h (the Yamanote Line train had applied emergency brakes). Thanks to the exceptional body strenght of the 103 Series, nobody on board the two trains was hurt.
*Occasionally, due to maintainance works, Keihin-Tohoku Line trains might be occasionally re-routed on Yamanote Line tracks and vice-versa. It's still used as of today, and such was the case with the 1972 incident.
https://twitter.com/kirameki350/status/1302961365590523907?s=21
^^
for anybody who doesn’t know what the video is about. Is about V6 being towed away and heard to become the first 500 to be scrapped.
And as why is it getting scrapped is because of it being a 500 to being spare parts for the rest of the 500.
so... why am I saying this here is that. I am hoping that somebody will do a easy reskin of hirochic’s 500 kodama from the V2 logo to the V6 logo. So that V6 could be preserved within trainz
Instead it's actually good news: a 500 Series being "sacrificed" to be a spare parts donor to keep it's siblings running means that JR West is not yet planning a replacement of the 500 Series!
The average age of the 500 Series fleet is 24 years, with the oldest set being 25 and the "newest" 22, in other words, they're running out of time, and will be inevitably retired soon.
If you count that no single car of any Shinkansen train ever reached a service life of more than 30 years (a record wich is currently held by a 200 Series car built in 1982 and retired in 2012), it means that the 500 Series will be completely retired in 5-6 years' time (7-8 if we're lucky) but with set V6 being set aside as spare parts donor, it means that depsite nearing their service life, JR West hasn't completely gave up the 500 Series yet.
Also just a final question:
Does my content work fine in T:ANE or TZ19 or are there any issues? I'm also especially curious about how the DD54 looks like in TZ19 - i'd like to upgrade to it sooner or later.