Approach_Medium
Trainz Addict
Hi;
I am building a prototype CTC route and want signals at interlockings to function as though there were a dispatcher setting them.
The passing tracks are between 3 and 4 miles long, and have Safetran 06 signals protecting them in both directions.
There are between 3 and 4 automatic (05 type) signals between each interlocking. These signals are about 2 miles apart.
Here's the scenario: Two trains are being driven by AI.
There are no rules set to control either train.
A southbound train is in the interlocking at the end of a passing track, now entering single track main.
A northbound train is waiting on the passing track about 10 miles south.
AI has stopped the northbound train because the switch at its interlocking is lined main to main. I have set that switch before starting AI.
After the train has been stopped for about 10 seconds, AI changes the switch to reverse, and the signal turns to clear.
The train begins moving off the siding onto the single track main heading north.
Eventually, if I allow both trains to continue, they will come fact to face at stop signals, there will be gridlock, and the train dispatcher will be fired!
The reason both trains were allowed to occupy the same stretch of single track is that I have automatic signals between the "CP" signals, and therefore, each train had two clear blocks ahead when it arrived at the interlocking.
I would like a way to have the interlocking (CP) signals control each other, so that if the southbound is cleared for the single track, the northbound will not get anything but a stop signal.
In real life, the CTC computers take care of this. But as we all know, there is no CTC in TS.
I was wondering whether I could set up some triggers, and use the "trigger multiple signals" rule, but when I tried that, it worked, except that the signal returns to automatic once the trigger is clear.
So, unless I place triggers all along the single track, at distances that do not exceed the shortest train length, the system will not work properly.
Is there a rule like this one that would leave the signal in the stop position until a second trigger was cleared?
Something like the ATLS controller and trigger system.
Any ideas?
Thanks
FW
I am building a prototype CTC route and want signals at interlockings to function as though there were a dispatcher setting them.
The passing tracks are between 3 and 4 miles long, and have Safetran 06 signals protecting them in both directions.
There are between 3 and 4 automatic (05 type) signals between each interlocking. These signals are about 2 miles apart.
Here's the scenario: Two trains are being driven by AI.
There are no rules set to control either train.
A southbound train is in the interlocking at the end of a passing track, now entering single track main.
A northbound train is waiting on the passing track about 10 miles south.
AI has stopped the northbound train because the switch at its interlocking is lined main to main. I have set that switch before starting AI.
After the train has been stopped for about 10 seconds, AI changes the switch to reverse, and the signal turns to clear.
The train begins moving off the siding onto the single track main heading north.
Eventually, if I allow both trains to continue, they will come fact to face at stop signals, there will be gridlock, and the train dispatcher will be fired!
The reason both trains were allowed to occupy the same stretch of single track is that I have automatic signals between the "CP" signals, and therefore, each train had two clear blocks ahead when it arrived at the interlocking.
I would like a way to have the interlocking (CP) signals control each other, so that if the southbound is cleared for the single track, the northbound will not get anything but a stop signal.
In real life, the CTC computers take care of this. But as we all know, there is no CTC in TS.
I was wondering whether I could set up some triggers, and use the "trigger multiple signals" rule, but when I tried that, it worked, except that the signal returns to automatic once the trigger is clear.
So, unless I place triggers all along the single track, at distances that do not exceed the shortest train length, the system will not work properly.
Is there a rule like this one that would leave the signal in the stop position until a second trigger was cleared?
Something like the ATLS controller and trigger system.
Any ideas?
Thanks
FW
Last edited: