Built-in "dependencies"

[bobhahn]

I am in the process of uploading to the DLS my first-ever contribution, a session for the Mojave Subdivision.

I just got an automated email listing all of the dependencies that are not on the DLS. With the exception of my own HTML asset that I boneheadedly left off, these all appear to be items that are built-in with TS12.

Do I need to worry about these?

 

[Dermmy]

If they truly are built-in then 'no' but built-ins shouldn't get included in the non-DLS email...

 

[philskene]

Me too

Bob --

" ... these all appear to be items that are built-in with TS12."

I've had the same result too.

I suspect that the automated checking system looks at the built number and then compares it with built-in content that has been allocate do to that particular build number. Perhaps the system has not been updated so that build number x = TS12, or perhaps build number x = TS10 as well as TS12 so it defaults to TS10 content.

Phil