Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The telephoto lenses used make it look much worse than it is.So I suppose these railroads recruit trainmen exclusively from the Knievel family? How do they find employees willing to risk their lives on this kind of a railroad. It would be incoherent to believe that if their track, the basis for their railroad, is this bad, the rest of their safety and other systems would be any better.
Bernie
Not as bad as this ENTIRE railroad (see this video). (It's called the Maumee & Western Railroad). They were literally deemed "World's Worst Maintained Railroad". They were recently bought by by Peoria, Illinois-based Pioneer Railcorp's subsidary, the Michigan Southern Railroad. They do intend to revive the line and it's jagged rails mainly due to the large customer base on the line. (See this article).
In the case of this railroad, it's more a cost cutting measure. In fact, it's something that the PRR used to do. I think Conrail did it as well, but I'm not sure there. In any case, the idea was the railroad wouldn't fix ANYTHING so long as it still worked. So track was left alone as long as trains didn't derail. Didn't matter how shoddy it was, if the train didn't derail, it was good and dandy.
In Latvia the same happened. In the case of one line it was also a washout which was used to abandon the line. But the washout didn't even disturb any train services... Another line was closed in 2008 due to an accident where a lorry crashed into the only train that ran on the line - a 1997 built 70 seat railbus. They didn't put any other passenger train on the line and just complained to the people that the railbus was broken an lied about 25km/h speed restrictions on the line (Actually it was mostly 60km/h). The line was dismantled in 2009 with the railbus being fixed soon afterwards, now running on departmental dutiesGuilford Transportation (Pan Am Railways) did this to their branch lines to deliberately discourage service. Once the lines developed washouts, they used that to abandon them.
John
In Latvia the same happened. In the case of one line it was also a washout which was used to abandon the line. But the washout didn't even disturb any train services... Another line was closed in 2008 due to an accident where a lorry crashed into the only train that ran on the line - a 1997 built 70 seat railbus. They didn't put any other passenger train on the line and just complained to the people that the railbus was broken an lied about 25km/h speed restrictions on the line (Actually it was mostly 60km/h). The line was dismantled in 2009 with the railbus being fixed soon afterwards, now running on departmental dutiesThe old timetable still stands in the window of the terminus station with an angel of hope...
Picture
This spring there was a massive washout due to annual flooding on a grade 3 line here, but that was surprisingly fixed.
Before
After
Strangely 3 lines have been closed due to neighboring Lithuania being too greedy. They closed the ones on their side so to make longer journeys on their tracks.
Picture
The 100 km/h speed limit sign still survives from the closure.
That's about 28 mph, yes? Here there was one line (not a mainline, though) on which the passenger train had an average speed of EIGHT mph. That was in it's last years of operation. I know that in the Soviet times that train acted also as a traveling shop for locals so it stood long at stops, but I'm not sure if it was in it's last years of operation... Might be down just to the state of the tracks...It would take about 16 hours to travel the 450 miles of the mainline!
So I suppose these railroads recruit trainmen exclusively from the Knievel family? How do they find employees willing to risk their lives on this kind of a railroad. It would be incoherent to believe that if their track, the basis for their railroad, is this bad, the rest of their safety and other systems would be any better.
Bernie
Very interesting stuff here.
I am under the impression that most freight railroads - at least in North America - operate on the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" policy. Either that, or until they're forced via new regulation.