I think this question is going to be primarily aimed at stagecoach and boat, but I'm not going to turn down any thoughts
I've used the inverse slave before but never on live tracks. Currently I'm working on a control method for a moving bridge (actually 2 near each other, but that's not important) that stays down until a boat comes along. So far so good on using an inverse to keep it down until triggered by a boat "engine" on the river track - the inverse is connected invisibly to the actual bridge tracks and disappears when triggered, and the real trains travel over completely separate invisible tracks at the bridge, so no interaction at present. That part is no problem.
What I'm trying to figure out is how to control the signals approaching the bridge, my thinking was to use either a slave or an inverse slave on the live tracks for the bridge, but my concern is how to you keep that slave from accidentally appearing when there is a train already on the bridge. The reason I say this is aimed somewhat at stagecoach is because I looked through his ATLS Advanced demo and noticed that he too did this with an inverse slave, but don't completely understand how you would keep this from interfering with a train going over the bridge when the boat triggers it. I can't really test this properly in the demo either because I cannot get the actual boat to download and attempting to replace it with a different one forces me to save a new session, thus resetting all the ATLS controls anyway...
This is a route based on the actual Buffalo Belt Line, these bridges are the bascule bridges that cross the Buffalo River at CSX CP-1 and CSX CP-DRAW, so Sen signals, for example, are not an option. Because the CP-DRAW bridge carries not only the CSX mains but also provides trackage rights to 4 other railroads there are no fewer than 12 signals approaching the bridge separately on as many different lines... so I don't see using a trigger signal rule as a great option either. I had also thought about using invisible tram stoppers but that will just put the 12 signals approaching the line at an approach instead of danger.
I've used the inverse slave before but never on live tracks. Currently I'm working on a control method for a moving bridge (actually 2 near each other, but that's not important) that stays down until a boat comes along. So far so good on using an inverse to keep it down until triggered by a boat "engine" on the river track - the inverse is connected invisibly to the actual bridge tracks and disappears when triggered, and the real trains travel over completely separate invisible tracks at the bridge, so no interaction at present. That part is no problem.
What I'm trying to figure out is how to control the signals approaching the bridge, my thinking was to use either a slave or an inverse slave on the live tracks for the bridge, but my concern is how to you keep that slave from accidentally appearing when there is a train already on the bridge. The reason I say this is aimed somewhat at stagecoach is because I looked through his ATLS Advanced demo and noticed that he too did this with an inverse slave, but don't completely understand how you would keep this from interfering with a train going over the bridge when the boat triggers it. I can't really test this properly in the demo either because I cannot get the actual boat to download and attempting to replace it with a different one forces me to save a new session, thus resetting all the ATLS controls anyway...
This is a route based on the actual Buffalo Belt Line, these bridges are the bascule bridges that cross the Buffalo River at CSX CP-1 and CSX CP-DRAW, so Sen signals, for example, are not an option. Because the CP-DRAW bridge carries not only the CSX mains but also provides trackage rights to 4 other railroads there are no fewer than 12 signals approaching the bridge separately on as many different lines... so I don't see using a trigger signal rule as a great option either. I had also thought about using invisible tram stoppers but that will just put the 12 signals approaching the line at an approach instead of danger.