A number of signatures are still oversized/ Request to disable images in signatures

Status
Not open for further replies.
Size

I like Billboards on the highway...they help hide the yucky city scenes. Very few signatures bother me...I enjoy them...just my 2 cents:p
 
I like Billboards on the highway...they help hide the yucky city scenes. Very few signatures bother me...I enjoy them...just my 2 cents:p

I once made the same observation when picture sigs were attacked here a long time ago. I mentioned that they were like the "Burma Shave" signs on the side of roadways, and that each one made me think of a friend...
 
I only see one sig! What's going on here?

When I saw the two very similar sigs I kind of figured something had "hic-uped" LOL. this is what I see when I see one of your posts dave:

dave.jpg


peter
 
Quoted for truth. If you can't follow the rules you should face the consequences.

Dmdrake: The first image fine, the second one is 500x118 not over, but I wouldn't have checked if they weren't double stacked myself.

Oh yes and maybe narrowgauge is right, which is why I'm trying to refrain from amking pointless threads, but I still think that there is just too much hype over this. Yes this problem should be taken care of but if you contact a moderator they will take care of it. And BTW I do not need you to second how stupid I am GP-38 thank you.
 
Let-em blow!

Oh yes and maybe narrowgauge is right, which is why I'm trying to refrain from amking pointless threads, but I still think that there is just too much hype over this. Yes this problem should be taken care of but if you contact a moderator they will take care of it. And BTW I do not need you to second how stupid I am GP-38 thank you.
They have a right to thier opinon, but that stops are the end of your nose! Free Speech Rules, long live the south!
 
Well said AC.
Everybody has their own opinoin on this matter, I have mine and you guys have yours, geez we sound like a bunch a politicians argueing over some silly matter!:hehe:
 
I agree, banning outright is not the right path...

As for amount of text, 120 characters is the max. Now, how this is laid out, there are no actual regs for.Zec
I played around with this and the 120 character limit includes all character spaces included in your signature. Those includes all blank spaces between words or sentences, all characters needed for the link to an image plus the imgs and [s needed to make it show on the forum. On one of the sig images I had once I exceeded the character limit because of were I had the image hosted. The routing to get to the image was very long character wise even though the image itself was way within bounds of the CoC. I changed were it was hosted so it had less characters in the link with the same image and then it was excepted.

Bill
 
And the award for best "And who really cares...?" post goes to... *tears open envelope*... Red_Rattler *cue cheesy victory music*
 
I like the signatures for the links. I've been at this for a little while, but I have found many of the sites I use frequently from the links when I got started.
 
Is my sig still showing twice?

Yes.

Could one of them happen to be the "banner" that you can upload to your Auran profile? I remember there being something about banners when I set up my account, but apart from changing my country (really, Auran, I know I was gone for over a year, but changing my location to Afghanistan!?!?!?) and registering my (unused) 2004 and 2009 serials, I haven't been back to the profile page in ages.

If it is indeed his banner, maybe a message to the helldesk* would be in order.

I still hold that the sig limits would best be handled by Auran turning on the sig-limit features in Vbulletin. The biggest downside is that Auran would be hosting the sigs/banners (they'd be uploaded rather than linked in from your host of choice).

*term shamelessly stolen from the B*stard Operator From Hell stories.
 
It has never shown twice for me. Personally I think that this whole thread is kinda ridiculous. No offense, but I thought that the mods were the people who were supposed to police the forums. Singling out one member like you did, and basically placing the blame on him, is wrong, and I take offense to it, especially because it doesn't seem to be his fault in the first place. Also, if I remember correctly, you were the one who told me that the file size of my sig was too big, which it was. I happily changed it, but the thing that I don't understand is this. If it was exactly the size that it was supposed to be dimension wise, then how did you notice that it was too large file size wise. To do that you would have had to actually investigate the signature by taking time to right click it, and go down to properties. This would mean that you have taken it upon yourself to investigate the size of everyone's signature to make sure that it was within limits. No offense, but you aren't a mod, why are you doing their work?

I hope that this isn't taken as flaming, but if it is, I really don't care. What has set me off, is the fact that Dmdrake asked you to remove the link that singles him out in your first post, and you just ignored his request. No offense, but I have lost respect for you. I hope that you aren't one of those people who sit and spy out the windows to write down any small crime that goes on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top