Recent content by pitmilly

  1. P

    Rogue Vertex Markings

    Many thanks John. Problem solved - route/session track mixup as you surmised. regards John
  2. P

    Rogue Vertex Markings

    When carrying out alterations to a WIP loco shed track layout have been left with three adjacent rogue vertex markings - X X X. There is no visible evidence of any connected track or any other spline related asset to which they might still be, or once were, attached. They appear to be...
  3. P

    appearance of water

    Many thanks - problem resolved using the layer Delete button
  4. P

    appearance of water

    Thank you for this advice Peter, but may I please run a possibly more complex issue past you. Am running TR22PE, Build 132285. Have a 50 mile TransDEM derived WIP of the GWR Carmarthen to Aberystwyth line and am using Surveyor Classic set at 5mm grid. The sea/tide/shoreline is represented at...
  5. P

    Ideas for a Hudson & western era DB&EV map

    You may already know but there’s a book “Where Did the Tracks Go in the Catskills?” written by Michael Kurdish. It covers most of the railroads in that entire area with schematic track diagrams for all townships between Rondout and Oneonta including the original and the modified routes around...
  6. P

    GWR 72XX 2-8-2T

    Thank you both for getting back to me. It's much as I thought and I share your views. As I've no reskinning skills I think I may have a word with some more talented contacts. regards John
  7. P

    GWR 72XX 2-8-2T

    Content Manager lists the GWR livery versions K 2:116296:72172:1 / 2 - (Skipper 1945) as now being Obsolete. Unfortunately, while the same loco is still available in a very presentable BR livery - (K 2:116296:72172:5), I'm looking for the 1920/30's GWR livery versions for a WIP. Does...
  8. P

    A little help with the surveyor

    Thank you John, Peter. Have moved on to 22 Plus.
  9. P

    A little help with the surveyor

    I recently made the move to Trainz 22 PE Build 129335, principally to explore the supposed(?) advantages of Surveyor 2.0 Accepting the inevitable learning curve, I have cloned an HD copy of a WIP and have been using Surveyor 2.0 to fine tune the existing terrain, particularly track cuttings...
  10. P

    A Sad End to an Epic Run for Me with Trainz.

    Plea accepted - case closed. However, I still believe that the sentiment expressed in the last paragraph of John Citron’s post #8 applies.
  11. P

    A Sad End to an Epic Run for Me with Trainz.

    Yes WSR and pware, I can agree with both your viewpoints, but I wasn’t the individual making the claim “that the spline issue was easily resolved”.
  12. P

    A Sad End to an Epic Run for Me with Trainz.

    OK, so the spline issue is easily resolved. If it was so simple why was the update sent out without being checked for such easily identified errors and having been identified, and so easily rectified, why have the powers that be not corrected their error?
  13. P

    Trainz Update Announcement (SP5)

    I think I shall delay loading this update(?) until such time as you brave knowledgable folks have managed to get the dust to settle. regards John
  14. P

    Broken Turntables TRS22

    Thank you Ken for your 16/11/22 posting. I had seen others but not this. Interesting that Malc had identified the same problem because it is one of his assets that I'd been using and to the best of my knowledge this specific problem has only surfaced in the last fortnight. Very odd. John
  15. P

    Broken Turntables TRS22

    1. Seems my theory doesn't hold true for all routes. Have one modified WIP where the reinstalled turntable is still minus tracks. Back to the drawing board. 2. Further testing reveals that regardless of my "Save as" theory - post #11 (which enabled me to replace/reload CL 62ft...
Back
Top