Recent content by amigacooke

Looking good :)

Annie, do you have an image in your signature as each of your posts has a missing image (I’m in the UK)?

Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway is probably the most famous of Britain's Great Little Railways.

I’d advise putting those who upset you on ignore, that way it’s out of sight out of mind.

'The first Trainz Plus release after TRS19', doesn't that logically imply that when TRS19 was launched, Trainz Plus didn't have the extra features?

Alright then, I won't.

The graphic is dated, so you can see when it refers to. The point is that the retail version of Trainz and Trainz Plus were feature identical at that time. That is no longer the case as N3V has chosen to make the latest retail version feature inferior. Now if you’re a subscriber I can see why...

Trainz Plus Member just to the right of TRS19 Platinum Edition.

When it comes to features the TRS19 FAQ page comparison chart seems to disagree. https://www.trainzportal.com/pages/trs19-faqs

No and fair enough. The subscription was bought in as an alternative choice. The benefit was that you gained access to new features before the next retail version. The problem there was that it could look like you were playing extra to beta test the new features. So N3V have moved the...

When the subscription option came in we were told it wouldn't alter our options, but it did, that was the illusion. Buying a non-subscription option now means you can not have the full feature set, that was not the case with TRS19. If you want all the latest features you have to take a...

Since the subscription ‘option’ has been introduced parity between the two versions has been eroded. TRS22 at launch was not feature equivalent to the Trainz Plus at that time. The retail version is now feature inferior at all times. N3V has preserved the illusion of choice, not the reality.

If you have to pay to get access, then it's not free. It really is that simple.

Personally, I'm interested in the product, not the company.

Good to see the fix is fixing things. I wonder whether with a little more time, and a little more attention to the feedback on the release candidate, N3V could have avoided the situation altogether?