Question about my pc's ability to play TS2010

VeritechCEO

New member
Ok, currently I own TRS 2006 and a desktop computer with the following specs:

Pentium 4 3.0ghz
4 gb of ram
500 watt power supply
ATI AGP graphics card with 500 mb of ram (Will be installing an ATI AGP with 1 gb of ram soon)

I'm looking to upgrade to to TS2010 within the next 2 or 3 months, and I noticed one of the minumum requirments for TS2010 is a Pentium D 3.4 ghz. Unfortunately, my desktop's processor can not be upgraded much more then it is currently at due to motherboard limitations (at best I can upgrade to 3.2 ghz). Will my processor limitations on my desktop affect TS2010's ability to perform on my desktop?
 
really? it says 3.4? i run at a 2.8ghz and it runs fine. the power and memory should be fine also (i run less memory) but not sure about the graphics card though.
hope this helps :D
 
Your basically running a single core where as minimum for TS2010 is a Dual Core. Performance will be bad when also utilizing an AGP Configuration.
You have very little upgrade options due to old technology and limited supply. It will operate, but to a level compared to TS2006, I would probably bank on a "No".
 
Your basically running a single core where as minimum for TS2010 is a Dual Core. Performance will be bad when also utilizing an AGP Configuration.
You have very little upgrade options due to old technology and limited supply. It will operate, but to a level compared to TS2006, I would probably bank on a "No".

my computers less than his, exept on power, and runs 2010 just fine so i dont see why not
 
Ok, currently I own TRS 2006 and a desktop computer with the following specs:

Pentium 4 3.0ghz
4 gb of ram
500 watt power supply
ATI AGP graphics card with 500 mb of ram (Will be installing an ATI AGP with 1 gb of ram soon)

I'm looking to upgrade to to TS2010 within the next 2 or 3 months, and I noticed one of the minumum requirments for TS2010 is a Pentium D 3.4 ghz. Unfortunately, my desktop's processor can not be upgraded much more then it is currently at due to motherboard limitations (at best I can upgrade to 3.2 ghz). Will my processor limitations on my desktop affect TS2010's ability to perform on my desktop?

Judging by what a lot of other people I've run into, you can get away with this, though you'd probably want to turn down anti-aliasing and maybe the draw distance sliders. Disabling/removing any resident anti-virus/spyware software will help, as well as physically or virtually disconnecting your network while using Trainz. There are even ways to set up your machine such that it can only contact the DLS and nothing else, but it's still a good idea to run completely offline if you can.

If you want to take it a step further, use your current machine as an internet/email rig and spend a few hundred on a "gaming" rig that is not internet-enabled. There are a lot of options, a whole lot of in-betweens here, just tell us what performance level you are willing to settle with versus how much, if anything, you're willing to spend.
 
I'm running TS2010_SP2 on the following:

P4 @ 3.4Ghz on Asus P5AD2-E Premium mobo - Over-clocking set to Auto
3Gigs DDR2 @ 533Mhz
500G 7200rpm 32MB buffer HDD on SATA
BFG GeForce 9800 GTX+ 512MB video

Trainz runs well as long as I keep the draw distance at or below 3000m. Lower that when I am in congested areas such as large yards, or cities with lots of buildings.
I have also seen better performance when scenery detail is no higher than Normal. Setting to Low does pretty much the same thing as setting draw distance lower.

I usually have Antialiasing turned off. It really doesn't do much in Trainz anyway.
Make sure that Antialiasing is set to "application controlled' in your video control panel, or Trainz will use the default setting of the driver.

Also, make sure that you have the latest video drivers.

Increasing video memory probably won't buy you much. My problem is not frame rate, but rather a "choppy" performance as the train moves through the terrain. This seems to be due more to CPU and memory system than video.

Increasing system RAM beyond 3GB won't do anything at all, unless you are running a 64 bit CPU and OS. 32 bit can only use about 3GB (for Windows XP, you may need the /3GB switch in the boot.ini file in order to use even 3GB.)

After reading other threads on this issue, I believe that a lot of the problem is how TS2010 was coded (using a lot of old code), rather than hardware issues.

As far as I can tell, despite all of the issues, TS2010 runs better on my system than both TS2006 and TS2009. The difference between 2006 and 2010 is the draw distance.
With TS2009, the draw distance was upgraded to 5000m. This puts a huge strain on older systems.
The solution is to be happy with not more than 3000m distance, and normal detail for everything.

Also, when creating your own routes, try not to over-populate. Too much scenery in one area will slow the performance significantly.
Building large yards (and filling them) will cause huge performance hits.
I should have realized this when I built the 8,000 car Selkirk yard on my CSX River Line route. No way am I ever going to get even 1,000 cars in there and still move any trains.

One more thing: If you buy 2010, make sure you get all the service paks.
I would assume that the download version is up to date, but when you buy the DVD, that will depend on how long your supplier has it sitting on the shelf.

My final vote is to go with TS2010. There are a lot of improvements over 2006, and it will run on your system.

FW
 
i am running trs2009 sp 3 on p4 3.00 ghz 512 mb ram ad 128 mb video memory every thing is fine
 
Increasing system RAM beyond 3GB won't do anything at all, unless you are running a 64 bit CPU and OS. 32 bit can only use about 3GB (for Windows XP, you may need the /3GB switch in the boot.ini file in order to use even 3GB.)

They can use 4Gb. The /3Gb switch changes the default allocation allowing a program to use up to 3Gb, provided it's large-address-aware (and TS2010 is. Not sure about TS2009.)
 
They can use 4Gb. The /3Gb switch changes the default allocation allowing a program to use up to 3Gb, provided it's large-address-aware (and TS2010 is. Not sure about TS2009.)
OK. So the max Windows can use is 4GB, but the max any one app can use is 3GB?

I have never seen TS2010 run that high on my system. It's usually not even 2GB when I have a large route open and running.

FW
 
Back
Top