Super Huge Locomotive's

dragonharh

Acount Deleted
dragonharh_20130219_0000_zps44af6484.jpg


Can you do better ?
 
While my locomotive creation skills are 0, I do know a thing or two about a few. (Hey look, I rhymed.)

While not HUGE in that they where the longest or heave st, I all ways fancy the Triplex as one heck of a huge locomotive. (2-8-8-8-2)

http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/triplex/triplex.htm

But thats nothing compared to the Allegheny, which is heavier then the Big Boy. The Allegheny weighs in at 771,000-lbs, or about 38.5 tons vs the Big Boy coming in at 762,000 lb, or 38.1 tons. (Interesting tid bit I found, 1604, one of the two Allegheny's left and on display, was moved to the B&O Railroad Museum in 1990 by none other then Pere Marquette #11. PMR #11 is an SW1 type locomotive and one of my favorite switchers.)
 
The Allegheny weighs in at 771,000-lbs, or about 38.5 tons vs the Big Boy coming in at 762,000 lb, or 38.1 tons.

Try increasing that 10 times! A loaded truck on the highway is 40 tons. Me thinks you mean 385 tons! 38.5 is light as a feather in railroad terms! ;)
 
Might have done my math wrong. 771000/2000=385.5

Thinking back, I might have missed a 0 on the olde abacus.
 
I like to call it the DDA40X on steroids.

But nawh, seriously I think he calls it the DDA50X or DDA100X. Something like that...
 
But thats nothing compared to the Allegheny, which is heavier then the Big Boy. The Allegheny weighs in at 771,000-lbs, or about 38.5 tons vs the Big Boy coming in at 762,000 lb, or 38.1 tons. (Interesting tid bit I found, 1604, one of the two Allegheny's left and on display, was moved to the B&O Railroad Museum in 1990 by none other then Pere Marquette #11. PMR #11 is an SW1 type locomotive and one of my favorite switchers.)

Well, if we compare locomotive size by tractive effort, then Great Northern's R-1 and R-2's (2-8-8-2's) take down both the Allegheny and the Big Boy.

R-1
142,165 lbs.
R-2
162,475 lbs.
Allegheny
110,211 lbs.
Big Boy
135,375 lbs.

GN was reknowned for being able to make their engines literally better than new when they rebuilt them. It is also cool to me knowing that my favortie railroad built some of their own locomotives.
 
A Thought...

Don't know about tractive effort (though it had enough to tear up track when misused as a helper) but for length... PRR's BP-1 officially consisted of two Baldwin DR-12-8-3000 "Centipedes" drawbar-connected for a 2-D+D-2+2-D+D-2 configuration. Whole set had the same road number and everything. 91 1/2-ft long ... doubled.

Hmmm... just looked it up and tractive effort was a mere 102,500... but that's for half the official locomotive, so 205,000 the set.

And (though there isn't one for Trainz...yet) mustn't forget Virginian's EL-2Bs - 2(B-B+B-B) - at 260,000 tractive effort the set. They also had one road number per set, but it might be considered cheating to take power from the overhead. Any rules to this competition?
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking that this tractive effort thing was more for steam locomotives. I will create another thread in the Prototype section so we don't hijack this thread from screenshots any further.
 
Cool ! go easy on the throttle though ...I can imagine them pulling up the rails and spitting them out the back like a Jack Russel digging for moles...:)
 
Back
Top