How bent are these tracks really?

This first part, yes, it has some definite foreshortening due to the angle looking down the tracks. But given that the train is shaking like a wet puppy, it looks like there is definitely a fair amount of bend. And at the 1:00 mark it has to actually stop to ease its way over something. later on in the video some of those tracks look fairly accurate.
 
This first part, yes, it has some definite foreshortening due to the angle looking down the tracks. But given that the train is shaking like a wet puppy, it looks like there is definitely a fair amount of bend. And at the 1:00 mark it has to actually stop to ease its way over something. later on in the video some of those tracks look fairly accurate.

It looks like rail carriers have to weigh the cost of track upkeep against potential lawsuits if somebody were to get hurt. If I were a rich RR owner, I would have no personal pride in tracks like that.
There should still be govt. regulations/standards regarding RR upkeep and safety subjecting RR industry to fines. They could level the track with a machine.

 
Last edited:
You have to look at the class of track, which is different than the class of railroad. Each class is regulated differently with the amount of ties that must be good per section of track. Excepted track is the very lowest. Does it handle freight only, or does it handle passengers? How fast does the railroad want to go? How much tonnage goes across the track? Branch line, spur, or yard track don’t get maintained to high standards. The traffic has to justify the cost.
 
You have to look at the class of track, which is different than the class of railroad. Each class is regulated differently with the amount of ties that must be good per section of track. Excepted track is the very lowest. Does it handle freight only, or does it handle passengers? How fast does the railroad want to go? How much tonnage goes across the track? Branch line, spur, or yard track don’t get maintained to high standards. The traffic has to justify the cost.

Against the risk of a lawsuit? The freight-only trains could still derail at only 5 MPH. It could roll over at a crossing and crush a motorist waiting at the gate. It could roll over and crush a boy playing along the track.

 
its all down to lack of inspection, there are standards, but all too often the authorities don't inspect railroads such as this unless they get a complaint .[h=2]What are a railroad’s options regarding FRA-type track defects? [/h] "Railroads are required to comply with class of track by making sure the conditions are acceptable for the speeds they desire to operate. If a track does not meet the intended class, a railroad has three basic options: 1) repair the defect; 2) slow the trains to the next lowest class that meets the threshold of the condition; or 3) remove the track from operation.
it would appear this road falls into category three but I expect its too small to bother with.

and of course in industrial plants inspection procedures are even laxer.


"FRA does not have the manpower or resources to regularly inspect trackage within industrial installations, nor does it currently see the need. However, since the enactment of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, FRA has had at its disposal statutory authority to issue emergency orders to repair or discontinue use of industrial or plant trackage should the agency find that conditions of the track pose a hazard of death or injury. In other words, if FRA learns that a particular plant is using trackage that is in such disrepair that it poses a threat of death or injury to a plant employee, a railroad employee, or the public at large, FRA will inspect that track. If FRA finds that the allegations are true, the agency may issue an emergency order ordering the plant to discontinue using the track until specified repairs are made. It is FRA’s opinion that this emergency-order authority is sufficient power to ensure track safety within plants. If conditions or events in the future tend to demonstrate that track safety within plants or installations should be more specifically regulated, FRA will seek to change the track safety regulations accordingly."
 
Against the risk of a lawsuit? The freight-only trains could still derail at only 5 MPH. It could roll over at a crossing and crush a motorist waiting at the gate. It could roll over and crush a boy playing along the track.

There are lots of derailments that happen every year. Most of them don’t roll over. They simply get off track a little bit. I don’t think 5mph has much of a roll over chance. In most cases those motorists or playing along the line would be fine as they should be far enough back. If the child is close enough, at 5 mph, then they are within the right of way in most cases that they would be trespassing. Most derailments are small cases, and would not be a cause of a lawsuit, and isn’t factored in to how well to maintain the track. If passengers are handled of over the track, then the standards are tightened as the minimum class of track is higher.
 
Back
Top