switchmen37
Member
hello first
if i was an street running train engineer ill go not no 25 mph more like 45 or 55 mph. and those people who dont want to stop at the gate and run the gate while the train is within 50ft oh well to bad for you just became fertilizer for the ground. its like playing dodge ball with the train and the car will lose every time crossing the tracks just to beat the train and saved about what 15 secs instead of waiting; stupid go ahead and kill your self just because you dont and to wait for a few mins and the twisted bunch of metal that use to be a car will it just became kids playground equipment not really .
train is a business they have a time schedule from point a to point b if they dont make it then in the time period the company loses the contract; iam just saying thats what i was told. i dont know how true it. faster is better faster you get there from to point a to point b the better, so my point, if the trains go as fast as they can to get from point a to point b so good so they can trun around sooner load up on the consist go fatser. faster they go the more companies they will supply and more companies will be happy and keep the contract with the rail road. faster means money for the railroads.
o
next the tracks were there long before the town or city was there. so what mayor of the town decides to build a town around the track with the tracks going down in the middle of the road with businesses on both sides of it it well thats just bad planning those mayors knew the track were there and decieded to sy yeah lets bulild the town with tracks down the min road did they not think the safty of the vehicles traffic or better yet the safety of the pedestrians who visit the businesses with x amount of feet maybe 20ft on both sides iam just guessing
switchmen37
if i was an street running train engineer ill go not no 25 mph more like 45 or 55 mph. and those people who dont want to stop at the gate and run the gate while the train is within 50ft oh well to bad for you just became fertilizer for the ground. its like playing dodge ball with the train and the car will lose every time crossing the tracks just to beat the train and saved about what 15 secs instead of waiting; stupid go ahead and kill your self just because you dont and to wait for a few mins and the twisted bunch of metal that use to be a car will it just became kids playground equipment not really .
train is a business they have a time schedule from point a to point b if they dont make it then in the time period the company loses the contract; iam just saying thats what i was told. i dont know how true it. faster is better faster you get there from to point a to point b the better, so my point, if the trains go as fast as they can to get from point a to point b so good so they can trun around sooner load up on the consist go fatser. faster they go the more companies they will supply and more companies will be happy and keep the contract with the rail road. faster means money for the railroads.
o
next the tracks were there long before the town or city was there. so what mayor of the town decides to build a town around the track with the tracks going down in the middle of the road with businesses on both sides of it it well thats just bad planning those mayors knew the track were there and decieded to sy yeah lets bulild the town with tracks down the min road did they not think the safty of the vehicles traffic or better yet the safety of the pedestrians who visit the businesses with x amount of feet maybe 20ft on both sides iam just guessing
switchmen37
