In TANE and TRS19 SP1 when you moved a layer by dragging it up or down to a new level in the layer tool, the swap was instantaneous. In TRS19 PE SP2 each layer move is immediately followed by watching a progress bar crawl its way across the screen at a glacial pace. The slow pace may be a product of a large number of layers (more than can fit into the display area) or the large layout size (151Mb according to CM) or both. But the same route when used in TRS19 PE SP1 never produced such delays when moving layers.
My question is - what is TRS19 SP2 doing that requires such an excruciatingly slow process that TRS19 SP1 was not doing? I did not think that the order of the layers made any difference, apart from not having the layer containing track objects (levers, signals, etc) higher up the order list than the layer containing the track.
If you are moving layers regularly because they will not all fit in the display area, then this is quite frustrating.
My question is - what is TRS19 SP2 doing that requires such an excruciatingly slow process that TRS19 SP1 was not doing? I did not think that the order of the layers made any difference, apart from not having the layer containing track objects (levers, signals, etc) higher up the order list than the layer containing the track.
If you are moving layers regularly because they will not all fit in the display area, then this is quite frustrating.