Explaination Please

DaveL

Recovering RBR Addict
Can someone explain to me why My AI loco responded to the "runaround" command 2 days ago and now starts to respond but, stops to wait
for a junction to change and after the junction changes, refuses to move. Just sit there and idles.

Dave

TRS19 PLUS
105100
 
No need to, now, I just ran it again and it worked as it should.
I just LOVE not knowing what is going to work and what is not going to work!!!

Dave
 
No need to, now, I just ran it again and it worked as it should.
I just LOVE not knowing what is going to work and what is not going to work!!!

Dave

The crew was probably staring into their smartphones.
 
Well, all I have to say is that there is far too much wrong with even 105100 when it comes to the AI operations!!
Different place in same session, same problem, should be moving, but will not.
Oh, and no driver messages either.

Dave
 
There have been no changes to AI for 105100, so any difference in behaviour is to do with track and signals.

Given that it changed on your same build, then clearly something changed on the route. Perhaps additional track was laid, signal changes, content updates (which could mean new scripts).

Something else to check is whether you're starting the "original" session with session rules not run/completed, or running a saved session where some of the rules have already been run. See http://game.ts2009.com/mediaWiki/index.php/Unified_Driver_Surveyor

Given the nature of code, the AI does exactly the same every time in the same circumstances. That doesn't mean 100 tests will have identical results as "timing" could play a factor due to your PC running faster or slower (e.g. more/less background apps running) triggering a script a split second before or after the previous run. (That's a layman explanation for one possible difference, not saying it is the only variable).

Fwiw, usually when a loco gets "stuck" you can try Stop Schedule > Continue Schedule and that will often clear things. Another option is to Stop, manually intervene then Continue.

And one last thing - yes, we do need to improve the AI in cases such as when you describe, and to provide more feedback as to why it is doing what it is doing (which may appear to be "nothing" but is in fact "something").

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Tony,

Thanks a lot for your answer. It gives me a lot to "chew" on. Some I have an answer for, some I don't.
I will write up a lot more later today or tomorrow morning (PST).

Dave
 
Back
Top