majortom100967
Member
Hi.
I'm wondering if switching from an RX580 to a VEGA56 could be wortwhile for my necessities. On my system (MBPro 2018 4TB3 - 2.7GHz i7 - 16/500 w/eGPU/RX580) I'm having pretty good performance at axceptable (by my point of view) settings.
The matter is (see attache images): the CPU doesn't work at full speed (200% to 260% average usage - circa 80/85% per core - and 2,80/2,90 GHz average speed) IF COMPARED to Handbrake's encodings (400% max usage and 3,20-3,30 GHz speed. What I believe is that the video card isn't able to keep up with the CPU's power and then, MAYBE, a more powerful GPU could give me better results.
But: I've been looking around and in real game playing (I don't care about strict benchmarks which vary a lot one within another) the fps increase is around +30%. But I'm not interested in just a 30% speed increase if compare to the 900€ I need to spend in order to change my eGPU box and the VEGA56.
Any opinion/suggestion is welcome. Thanks, Simon. (sorry for the huge image)
I'm wondering if switching from an RX580 to a VEGA56 could be wortwhile for my necessities. On my system (MBPro 2018 4TB3 - 2.7GHz i7 - 16/500 w/eGPU/RX580) I'm having pretty good performance at axceptable (by my point of view) settings.
The matter is (see attache images): the CPU doesn't work at full speed (200% to 260% average usage - circa 80/85% per core - and 2,80/2,90 GHz average speed) IF COMPARED to Handbrake's encodings (400% max usage and 3,20-3,30 GHz speed. What I believe is that the video card isn't able to keep up with the CPU's power and then, MAYBE, a more powerful GPU could give me better results.
But: I've been looking around and in real game playing (I don't care about strict benchmarks which vary a lot one within another) the fps increase is around +30%. But I'm not interested in just a 30% speed increase if compare to the 900€ I need to spend in order to change my eGPU box and the VEGA56.
Any opinion/suggestion is welcome. Thanks, Simon. (sorry for the huge image)
Last edited: