.
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Model layout -- experimentation and "proof of concept"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,687
     

    Default Model layout -- experimentation and "proof of concept"

    I've just been doing a little fiddling and experimentation with a T:ANE model railroad of mine, ported across into TRS19.

    I like the new track. And some of the textures, though maybe the green I've used is too green? But the ballast texture matches the track perfectly. The TurfFX is going to take some mastering. From the video (best watched full screen and at 1080p) I think it might be a little overdone.

    There's lots more work to be done, but as a "proof of concept" it's acceptable. Will it be worthwhile releasing this version? I'm not sure at this stage.



    Phil

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,028
     

    Default

    I think your drivers will be excited to drive on such a beautiful line.

    Regards

    Swordfish

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States of America, Pennsylvania, Murrysville
    Posts
    3,636
     

    Default

    Although YouTube prohibits full screen on my PC the route looks sufficient to demonstrate not only the mission of the route but the value of the new features. Subtle adjustments may make it better. I prefer a slightly darker setting at noon. It is too easy to wash out colors.
    Dick near Pittsburgh, Pa. i5-2500K 4.3ghz, 8gb memory, GTX1060 4gb video card

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States of America, Florida
    Posts
    7,223
    Blog Entries
    3
     

    Default

    Very nice Layout, Phil!
    Take Care my net-friend!
    Ish

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands, for now in, Montreal, CA
    Posts
    5,214
    Blog Entries
    1
     

    Default

    Really have to tame that grass. The new ground effects and clutter will have to be applied with a light touch unless a totally disused area is being modeled otherwise I find it looks - strange.


    70337:
    TRS19 Platinum, build 105100, Win10 Pro 64 bit, i7-7700 3.6GHz 16 GB, GTX 1070 Ti

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States of America, Colorado, Colorado Springs
    Posts
    858
     

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martinvk View Post
    Really have to tame that grass. The new ground effects and clutter will have to be applied with a light touch unless a totally disused area is being modeled otherwise I find it looks - strange.


    I think a needed option is to have the clutter not paint over tracks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands, for now in, Montreal, CA
    Posts
    5,214
    Blog Entries
    1
     

    Default

    Probably one of the consequences of objects not being able to "see" each other. The same reason one object can pass through another. With bounding boxes, this is being addressed so that smoke no longer goes right through the roof. This would have to be user controlled at the object level or else we could no longer "create" larger buildings by nesting several smaller ones. Meanwhile will have to be careful to not paint the clutter and Turf too close to areas they shouldn't be.


    70337:
    TRS19 Platinum, build 105100, Win10 Pro 64 bit, i7-7700 3.6GHz 16 GB, GTX 1070 Ti

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States of America, Colorado, Colorado Springs
    Posts
    858
     

    Default

    OK, but textures don't paint over buildings, can tracks be treated in the same way? (of course, I don't have 2019 yet, perhaps the grass is like a building)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    United States of America, Texas, Dickinson
    Posts
    1,410
     

    Default

    Phil,
    It looks great. Mann, Fromm, Laramie, right? I just ported the TANE version to 2019 to see how it looked. It was nice, but your grass and clutter additions are really cool.

    If you are going to “adjust” all your routes to 2019 standards, I’ll leave the TANE ones on my old computer and run your adjusted ones on the new rig. Very nicely done.

    Gary

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,110
     

    Default

    Nice work. The parallax effect on the ballast texture creates some strange artefacts at sharp changes in ground geometry- particularly noticeable at the baseboard edge behind the train at around 6:15 onwards.

    R3

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    363
     

    Default

    It looks very good

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,687
     

    Default

    Thanks for all the comments and suggestions.


    • I prefer a slightly darker setting at noon. It is too easy to wash out colors.


    I agree. I'm still coming to terms with those three environmental dials. I'd like to see an easier and more precise way of making changes.


    • Really have to tame that grass. The new ground effects and clutter will have to be applied with a light touch unless a totally disused area is being modeled otherwise I find it looks - strange.



    • I think a needed option is to have the clutter not paint over tracks.


    I need to talk yet again to the President of the Railroad to approve expenditure on the JR Weed Control train. He's refused in the past but I think the video shows why we desperately need it.

    Seriously, I used two TurfFX layers, both identical to the "Grass Seeds 2" used in the built-in Content Samples route, except I changed the "geometry-scale" settings to 0.7 and 0.3. The 0.7 is the maximum height that can be used before the grass seeds protrude above the deck of those flat cars. The 0.3 is used beside and over the track. I've experimented more and found that using 0.2 instead of 0.3 produces minimal cover through the ballast between the running rails. I'll use this in future.


    • If you are going to “adjust” all your routes to 2019 standards, ... .


    I think one of the N3V newsletters referred to me as the "prolific creator" of model railroads? If I have to update all my previous layouts I might not have time to do new ones. But then again, some would be excellent candidates for use in TRS19. We will see.


    • The parallax effect on the ballast texture creates some strange artefacts at sharp changes in ground geometry- particularly noticeable at the baseboard edge behind the train at around 6:15 onwards.


    Yes, I noticed that too. It can also sometimes happen adjacent to the track ballast. It's one of the downsides of 3D PBR textures we might have to live with.
    __________

    For those who also want to experiment:

    Track --TRS19 Track 1. Main line height = 0; yard area track, depressed slightly, height = -0.10

    Textures -- PBR Gravel 2, Foliage 6, Grass 5, Aztec Ground Tiles 1, ConcretePavementCrackedGround (for the floor). Minimum setting, no rotation. In T:ANE I generally apply an undercoat and do a light sweep over with one or two textures. In TRS19 this don't work with the PBR textures -- no light texture overlays because this destroys the 3D effect.

    TurfFX -- based on "Grass Seeds 2" used in the built-in Content Sample route, but with the geometry-scale set to 0.7 for the long grass and 0.3 for short grass (but I will be using 0.2 for the latter from now on).

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,164
     

    Default

    Looks pretty impressive from here!

    Regarding the colours/fog/brightness, I'd really like the dials and sliders to display a numeric value. That would help getting reproducible effects. The advanced concept is to have number entry with save to disc facility...

    Colin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •