What seems like a long long time ago I asked about the possibility of optional smaller baseboard sizes to facilitate (among other things) model railway style layouts. IIRC Chris B commented on the thread to say that there was no performance benefit in smaller baseboards and thus just use a full baseboard. Also in another thread more recently the use of large and/or multiple dig-holes to define the boundary of a model railway baseboard.
I was wondering, given the popularity of model railway routes, if the subject of optional smaller baseboard sizes was worth revisiting ? Also it would be good to have some guidelines for the use of dig-holes if they are deemed to be a problem.
Needless to say I cannot find the relevant threads, so I'm working from my unreliable memory so apologies if I have missed something.
Chris M
I was wondering, given the popularity of model railway routes, if the subject of optional smaller baseboard sizes was worth revisiting ? Also it would be good to have some guidelines for the use of dig-holes if they are deemed to be a problem.
Needless to say I cannot find the relevant threads, so I'm working from my unreliable memory so apologies if I have missed something.
Chris M