.
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 134

Thread: Benchmarking your PC... let's see what you got!

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States of America, California, San Jose
    Posts
    5,072
    Blog Entries
    1
     

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewiscc65 View Post
    Ok Here is mine, realy thought it would be higher.

    UserBenchmarks: Game 68%, Desk 67%, Work 50%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4720HQ - 71.2%
    GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M - 73.2%
    SSD: SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 128GB - 68.3%
    HDD: HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB - 67.3%
    MBD: Asus G751JY
    I think that laptop is over a year and half old or close to it.

    Make train simulators great again #MTSGA obiter dictum

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia, Victoria, Traralgon
    Posts
    1,798
     

    Default

    UserBenchmarks: Game 14%, Desk 33%, Work 20%
    CPU: AMD FX-7600P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G - 34%
    GPU: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics - 8%
    HDD: Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB - 47.1%
    USB: WD Elements 750GB - 17.4%
    RAM: Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB - 22.2%
    MBD: Asus X550ZE

    No where close to what I thought I brought.

    Tom
    Acer Predator Helios 300 16gb ram, GTX1060 graphics on windows home 10
    TANE build 94916 TRS19 build 100240

  3. #33

    Default

    UserBenchmarks: Game 71%, Desk 47%, Work 41%
    CPU: AMD FX-8350 - 61.1%
    GPU: AMD R9 390 - 86.9%
    HDD: WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011) - 57.6%
    HDD: WD Blue 500GB (2010) - 54.8%
    RAM: Unknown BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB - 44.4%
    MBD: MSI 990XA-GD55 (MS-7640)

  4. #34

    Default

    hello

    UserBenchmarks: Game 79%, Desk 90%, Work 65%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K - 98,9%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1070 - 139%
    SSD: HyperX Fury 240GB - 65%
    HDD: Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB - 85%
    RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB - 77,7%
    MBD: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

    the worst point in all that is I can't even run decently TANE and especially Trainz 12 (less of 35 fps, especially in my projects in Trainz 12
    )

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,890
     

    Default

    iPodEdE - something is definitely throttling your performance there - your system spec should allow you to run both T:ANE and TS12 with very high performance settings/ visual splendor, with frame-rates way above 100FPS in most scenarios (with vertical synchronisation turned OFF). So what is causing this? Perhaps you are driving a 4K or higher monitor? Perhaps your SSD drive is almost full and leaves little headroom for file I/O? Or is it perhaps because the content in your projects is extremely high poly/ has poor LOD?
    I have a GTX 1070 card too and it storms T:ANE (and other demanding simulators) at the highest possible settings at Full HD (1080p) resolution. It would also do ok at 4K resolution too, I'd say, albeit with some of the settings turned down a tad. Only a GTX 1080 or Titan X (Pascal) would be better in terms of 4k performance.
    That said, I still find that there are occasional stutters in TS12 during driving sessions, even with my new card. T:ANE is much, much smoother.

  6. #36

    Default

    PC_Ace - hello and thank you for your answer

    now, T:ANE is running very correctly, in fact I "reseted" the game parameters by modifying the graphic options, by putting them at max !

    but for TS12, no solutions available unfortunately.
    I have a route project with almost 2000-2400 baseboards, it works perfectly with T:ANE but not at all with TS12, and it's very unfortunate, because of the compatibility of assets between TS12 and T:ANE

    both Trainz are installed in my SSHD, because of the weight.

    my screen is a 23" Philips with a max resolution of 1920x1080.

    IPodEdE

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    19
     

    Default

    UserBenchmarks: Game 108%, Desk 88%, Work 61%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K - 87.5%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1070 - 130.7%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 120GB - 110.7%
    HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB - 73.7%
    RAM: Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB - 54.4%
    MBD: MSI Z97I AC (MS-7851)

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom, Cheshire
    Posts
    3,475
     

    Default

    UserBenchmarks: Game 92%, Desk 89%, Work 59%

    CPU: Intel Core i5-4690K - 101.5% O/C 4.5 GHz, 1.15V Vcore
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB - 97.4% O/C Core Clock +150, Memory Clock +60
    SSD: SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB - 77% System
    SSD: OCZ Trion 100 240GB - 65% Trainz 2012 SP1
    HDD: WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB - 40.4%
    HDD: Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB - 48.1%
    HDD: Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB - 46.8%
    RAM: HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB - 73.7%
    MBD: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

    All overclocks tested stable, I'm sure there's a bit more O/clock headroom with both the CPU and GPU yet!

    Rob.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    St.Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    127
     

    Default

    Just finished my T:ANE box rebuild, no overclocking or fine tuning done yet.

    UserBenchmarks: Game 148%, Desk 118%, Work 101%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K - 87.2%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 - 180.6%
    SSD: Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 249.4%
    SSD: Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - 86%
    HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB - 93%
    RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB - 76.4%
    MBD: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

    T:ANE Build 83765 is running from the Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820147467
    Now to fine tune (and OC maybe).

    As an aside, T:ANE on AI is now like watching a Pixar BluRay DVD.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,890
     

    Default

    tallyken - Very impressive results for the 950 NVME PCIe M2 drive.
    I'm planning to acquire one of the new 960 EVO or PRO versions myself when they become available here. Thanks for posting.

    http://www.techradar.com/news/comput...er-ssd-1329086
    Last edited by PC_Ace; September 27th, 2016 at 10:42 PM.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom, Cheshire
    Posts
    3,475
     

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robd View Post
    UserBenchmarks: Game 92%, Desk 89%, Work 59%

    CPU: Intel Core i5-4690K - 101.5% O/C 4.5 GHz, 1.15V Vcore
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB - 97.4% O/C Core Clock +150, Memory Clock +60
    SSD: SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB - 77% System
    SSD: OCZ Trion 100 240GB - 65% Trainz 2012 SP1
    HDD: WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB - 40.4%
    HDD: Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB - 48.1%
    HDD: Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB - 46.8%

    RAM: HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB - 73.7%
    MBD: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER
    UserBenchmarks: Game 96%, Desk 92%, Work 62%

    CPU: Intel Core i5-4690K - 101.3%, O/C 4.5GHz, 1.16V Vcore
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB - 98.7%, O/C Core Clock +150, Memory Clock +60
    SSD: SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB - 80.3%, System
    SSD: OCZ Trion 100 240GB - 62.2%, Trainz 2012 SP1
    HDD: WD Black 1TB - 94.7%
    RAM: HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB - 74.1%
    MBD: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

    I got rid of the three oldish hard drives and installed new WD Black 1Tb, lifts the scores a bit but what a palava to copy the data!

    Now looking to aquire and install another ssd for T:ANE

    Rob.
    Last edited by robd; September 30th, 2016 at 11:23 AM.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    776
     

    Default

    Finally finished my PC build.....

    UserBenchmarks: Game 152%, Desk 151%, Work 119%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K - 111.5%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 - 172.7%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 1TB - 1,102.2%
    SSD: Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 272.6%
    HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB - 108.4%
    RAM: G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB - 101.3%
    MBD: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

    Should be 'adequate' as Rolls Royce would say

    By the way, I am not nitrogen cooling my Samsung 850 evo. The reason the benchmark is so high is that I have the Samsung Magician Rapid mode enabled, whereby it uses some system RAM to cache data.

    Now to move everything over from my iMAC. Time to invest in a large thumb drive, methinks.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States of America, Massachusetts, Haverhill
    Posts
    25,054
     

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vostrail View Post
    Finally finished my PC build.....

    UserBenchmarks: Game 152%, Desk 151%, Work 119%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K - 111.5%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 - 172.7%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 1TB - 1,102.2%
    SSD: Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 272.6%
    HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB - 108.4%
    RAM: G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB - 101.3%
    MBD: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

    Should be 'adequate' as Rolls Royce would say

    By the way, I am not nitrogen cooling my Samsung 850 evo. The reason the benchmark is so high is that I have the Samsung Magician Rapid mode enabled, whereby it uses some system RAM to cache data.

    Now to move everything over from my iMAC. Time to invest in a large thumb drive, methinks.
    Congratulations on your new build.

    I recommend getting an external hard drive like the Seagate Goflex or Desktop equivalent. I picked up a 4TB for about $150. There's no need to use their special software to copy data and just use it like a regular hard drive.

    John
    John
    Trainz User Since: 12-2003
    Trainz User ID: 124863
    T:ANE Build: 94829
    TRS2019: 98592

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,890
     

    Default

    Vostrail - it's amazing the extra performance you're getting from your PCIe M2 SSD as well.
    It won't be too long before these become the preferred choice for most new build's boot drives, methinks!
    You can use the Rapid mode RAM caching on those too - but only for one drive at a time.

    Edit Update: Check out this review of the amazing new Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe 2Tb M2 drive.
    Tests were done on Windows 8.1 for comparison to older SSD drives, so Windows 10 performance figures should be even better.
    (Something like this would make T:ANE more of a flying simulator. )

    http://techreport.com/review/30813/s...b-ssd-reviewed

    AND
    http://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/201...d-you-can-buy/
    Last edited by PC_Ace; October 19th, 2016 at 03:39 AM.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,890
     

    Default

    Check out the much more affordable super-speed performance of the Samsung Evo NVMe PCIe drives here in this review:

    http://techreport.com/review/30993/s...o-ssd-reviewed

    Reckon these would make the very best hard disk drives for any machine running T:ANE, particularly when run as the boot drive as well.
    Not available here yet from my preferred suppliers, but coming soon!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •