After a lot of mucking about with CMP I have managed to reduce the list of faulty assets to around a dozen (still looking for ways to fix them) and I have deleted missing assets from routes/sessions I can't find on the DLS or elsewhere, replacing those assets with an alternative where the gap is obvious, when running a route/session.
I have also done as many updates to out-of-date content as I can, although there are currently 57 assets shown in CMP as having an update available but which don't appear to have such an update on the DLS.
* My first question - how can an asset show the "update available" status in CMP when there is no such update on the DLS?
I also notice that there are 1885 "local" assets with the status "obsolete" shown in CMP. When I ask CMP to show all versions, there are indeed newer versions of those assets in my Trainz database.
* My second question: can these local-obsolete entries in CMP be safely deleted and will this shrink the Trainz data stored on the HD where my Trainz data is kept? Is it worth getting rid of these obsolete assets; does such a tidy-up help Trainz to load/run a bit faster, for example?
The O/S I use is Windows7 64bit. It seems to have an automated HD defragmenting process built in. The Windows Disk Management application is reluctant to let me instigate any defrag process myself and tells me it is done in the background so I needn't bother.
* My third question: is this Windows7 auto-defrag sufficient to keep the 200,000 assets in my Trainz data store well-ordered enough on my HD to make Trainz load/run processes as efficient as they can be? Is it worth using a 3rd-party degrag tool to order the data on the HD even better than does Windows7?
I have downloaded routes/sessions in the past then deleted them again when I decided they weren't for me. As I understand it, this leaves most of the assets downloaded as part of the route in the Trainz local database on my HD.
* My fourth question: is there a way to detect assets that are not used by any still-extant route/session in my Trainz database, so I can delete them? Even if there is such a detection method, is it worth deleting such unused assests?
Thanks for any advice you can give.
Lataxe
PS Apologies if answers are already out there in the forums - I can't seem to get much sense out of the forum search engine.
I have also done as many updates to out-of-date content as I can, although there are currently 57 assets shown in CMP as having an update available but which don't appear to have such an update on the DLS.
* My first question - how can an asset show the "update available" status in CMP when there is no such update on the DLS?
I also notice that there are 1885 "local" assets with the status "obsolete" shown in CMP. When I ask CMP to show all versions, there are indeed newer versions of those assets in my Trainz database.
* My second question: can these local-obsolete entries in CMP be safely deleted and will this shrink the Trainz data stored on the HD where my Trainz data is kept? Is it worth getting rid of these obsolete assets; does such a tidy-up help Trainz to load/run a bit faster, for example?
The O/S I use is Windows7 64bit. It seems to have an automated HD defragmenting process built in. The Windows Disk Management application is reluctant to let me instigate any defrag process myself and tells me it is done in the background so I needn't bother.
* My third question: is this Windows7 auto-defrag sufficient to keep the 200,000 assets in my Trainz data store well-ordered enough on my HD to make Trainz load/run processes as efficient as they can be? Is it worth using a 3rd-party degrag tool to order the data on the HD even better than does Windows7?
I have downloaded routes/sessions in the past then deleted them again when I decided they weren't for me. As I understand it, this leaves most of the assets downloaded as part of the route in the Trainz local database on my HD.
* My fourth question: is there a way to detect assets that are not used by any still-extant route/session in my Trainz database, so I can delete them? Even if there is such a detection method, is it worth deleting such unused assests?
Thanks for any advice you can give.
Lataxe
PS Apologies if answers are already out there in the forums - I can't seem to get much sense out of the forum search engine.