Missing KUIDS? Post them here!

<kuid:376853:106708> Passenger Truck (Magicland B60b). Is there a "dependencies" button on the download page? Oddly enough I have this asset but it shows no dependents, so I may have downloaded it independently somehow. If I had downloaded it with coaches, they would show as dependents.
 
<kuid:376853:106708> Passenger Truck (Magicland B60b). Is there a "dependencies" button on the download page? Oddly enough I have this asset but it shows no dependents, so I may have downloaded it independently somehow. If I had downloaded it with coaches, they would show as dependents.

There is is dependencies link but it just leads to "Truck.cdp", which I already have. And it shows up nowhere on the dependencies list page. Weird
 
Hello,

I am in a home run for completing dependencies for the route "Petite balade". It is an awesome map.

I am missing <kuid:553702:11114>,<kuid:307216:120159>,<kuid:553702:11119>,<kuid:553702:11132>,<kuid:553702:11116>,<kuid:553702:11124>,<kuid:553702:11105>,<kuid:553702:80083>,<kuid:553702:80524>,<kuid:431492:5995>

Full description of KUIDs from: https://www.trainzfrisson78.com/pages/accueil.html downloaded pdf KUID list called "LIST of KUIDs 553702 - Frisson78"

<kuid:553702:11114> F78-CAD59-GiuliaGT-1965-Red
<kuid:307216:120159> unknown
<kuid:553702:11119> F78-CAD59-PEUGEOT404break-Gendarmerie-bleue
<kuid:553702:11132> flo07-F78-Peugeot J7 L felix potin
<kuid:553702:11116> F78-CAD59-PEUGEOT404-1965-TaxiBORDEAU
<kuid:553702:11124> F78-CV-Citroen ID19 Break noir
<kuid:553702:11105> F78-SM55 Renault Floride avec driver
<kuid:553702:80083> F78-UNIC Saverne Poste2 route
<kuid:553702:80524> unknown
<kuid:431492:5995> unknown

I looked at KUID index, Google, other 2 sites, trainzfrisson78.com and https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.trainzfrisson78.com/* with no luck.

Thank you in advance.
 
There is is dependencies link but it just leads to "Truck.cdp", which I already have. And it shows up nowhere on the dependencies list page. Weird
Could you pls post a link to the page where the main asset is? <kuid:376853:106708> is not showing up even on the Trainz Forge searchable KUID pdf list.
 
I got a severe threat detected in KUID3.7z Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml "This program is dangerous and executes commands from an attacker". That was from Windows Defender, so it could be false positive.
 
Could be a false positive? How could it be anything else? It isn`t even executable, save for inside Trainz, and even there, it cannot be what Windows Defender thinks it is, unless it is an infected Native Interface asset, which sounds unlikely.
 
Hi Michal
<kuid:553702:11114>,<kuid:307216:120159>,<kuid:553702:11119>,<kuid:553702:11132>,<kuid:553702:11116>,<kuid:553702:11124>,<kuid:553702:11105>,<kuid:553702:80083>,<kuid:553702:80524>,<kuid:431492:5995>

Download:
https://www.uschovna.cz/zasilka/OPWWT9AEKK8VYJ5E-K2Y/7PACM6XIRK
clik of: STÁHNOUT ZÁSILKU

Ivo
None of the 60 antivirus programs found anything in this archive: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file...4bdae1bf945c3beba8d2edd5dd94bf258dc?nocache=1
 
Yeah, I don't know what its deal is, but it won't download it. I tried again and got the same result. Just in case others experience the same thing. I don't see any chance to override.
 
these are for Tracksupervisor's NSW Illawarra & Southern Highlands

<kuid:62941:502>
<kuid:62941:16057>
<kuid:429700:100392>
<kuid:429700:100264>
<kuid:62941:16056>
<kuid:62941:16055>
<kuid:141417:27015>
<kuid:59904:777901>
<kuid:429700:100193>
<kuid:429700:100186>
<kuid:155664:2001830>
<kuid:155664:2001820>
 
I got a severe threat detected in KUID3.7z Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml "This program is dangerous and executes commands from an attacker". That was from Windows Defender, so it could be false positive.
My "daily bread" IP scanner tool as I am a network admin is vigorously detected and deleted by not-so-clever MS Defender as a super dangerous virus. I am puzzled as to why would a .7z be marked as dangerous - it is an archive, not an executable. Only if inside is exe then possibly yes, bit not .cdp.
 
My "daily bread" IP scanner tool as I am a network admin is vigorously detected and deleted by not-so-clever MS Defender as a super dangerous virus. I am puzzled as to why would a .7z be marked as dangerous - it is an archive, not an executable. Only if inside is exe then possibly yes, bit not .cdp.
Defender, like many antimalware products, will scan inside archives. If malware is detected it'll delete or quarantine the infected file archive and all. It's possible to infect an asset. There is some malware that can infect image files and it's possible that a .tga file or a .png file was infected with something and the asset was trashed by Defender.
 
Defender, like many antimalware products, will scan inside archives. If malware is detected it'll delete or quarantine the infected file archive and all. It's possible to infect an asset. There is some malware that can infect image files and it's possible that a .tga file or a .png file was infected with something and the asset was trashed by Defender.
Very true. However, I could not detect anything. That is quite clever from the hackers to target pngs etc. I did not think that was possible. It appears it is.
 
I have always used various antiviruses from various well-known vendors and always got various issues from this. False positives and so on. A few years ago, I decided to get rid of it altogether.
I have removed a third-party antivirus and completely disabled Windows Defender via gpedit.msc.
All the issues and inconveniences went away with the antiviruses and the system working much faster. Nothing strange or suspicious has happened to the system over the years.

Warning: Do not try to do this if you do not have enough experience using a PC!
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much, Ivo, that is very kind of you. It worked fine. Proof that Defender just doesn't like .7z for some reason, although I have plenty of assets stored in .7z.
 
Very true. However, I could not detect anything. That is quite clever from the hackers to target pngs etc. I did not think that was possible. It appears it is.
That could've been a false positive. They happen, but yeah images can be infected.
https://gizmodo.com/malware-images-virus-photos-pictures-how-block-antiviru-1849572516

Fonts too and even binary-encoded EPS files. This technique was used to create the "Lino virus" that was aimed specifically at Linotronic imagesetters. These are large, I mean really, really large, film recording devices used to produce films for the printing industry. I can't find a link to any information on this one, thanks to the polluted search engines using directed searches, but it caused quite a stir in the early 90s.

The thing is any file containing binary data can be infected. Scary stuff!
 
I have always used various antiviruses from various well-known vendors and always got various issues from this. False positives and so on. A few years ago, I decided to get rid of it altogether.
I have removed a third-party antivirus and completely disabled Windows Defender via gpedit.msc.
All the issues and inconveniences went away with the antiviruses and the system working much faster. Nothing strange or suspicious has happened to the system over the years.

Warning: Do not try to do this if you do not have enough experience using a PC!
Yes, the machines definitely run faster but there's still that risk that something can get in. It's not that you aren't careful in your browsing habits and work carefully, what used to be a safe website could be infected. Recently, as people have reported here, once safe Trainz-content websites are infected with droppers or some other malware that can then infect your system.
 
Back
Top