Mar 25 2008 - MBTA Train #917 Struck By Runaway Lumber Car

goodell911

http://www.gaurc.us
mbta_accident.jpg


Click here to see the video: View the news report and the accident scene. Hear from the passengers, hospital staff and Fire Department Commander. Most importantly, hear from the locomotive engineer himself about what he saw, heard and felt.

Click here to hear the radio traffic.

Answers sought in Boston-area MBTA crash
by Robert Sears, The Brockton Enterprise

CANTON, Mass. - Investigators worked through the night to determine how a parked freight car could roll more than 2 miles and slam into a commuter train, injuring 150 passengers.

Most injuries in Tuesday's crash were minor and included facial cuts and bloody noses. None were life-threatening, Canton Fire Chief Thomas Ronayne III said.

A "large percentage" of the injured were taken by bus to three area hospitals, he said.

The freight car carrying lumber rolled from a privately owned siding in Stoughton onto the track used by the commuter train, MBTA Police Chief Paul MacMillan said.

He did not know the name of the company that owns the siding.

The train stopped before the impact at about 5:20 p.m. a short distance from the Canton Junction station because the moving freight car triggered track sensors that signaled the engineer, he said.

The freight car smashed into the front of the train's engine.

"If the signal had not worked, injuries would have been more severe," MacMillan said.

About 300 passengers were on the train.

At least 50 firefighters and 20 ambulance crews responded to the scene.

Allan Gilman, 66, of Easton was in the next-to-last car on the train and struck his face on the rear of the seat in front of him, cutting his nose and dislodging a lens from his eyeglasses. He did not go to a hospital.

There was no warning before the crash, he said.

"I thought we stopped for an Amtrak train; then whammo, we got hit," said Gilman, who works in Boston for the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts.

The freight car's contents that were strewn on the ground appeared to be a composite outdoor deck material, he said.

A conductor got word to those in the car immediately behind the engine seconds before impact, said Mike Connor, 39, of Easton.

"I heard chirps on the conductor's radio. He left the car, then came back in and said a car had broken lose on our track and we were going to get hit," Connor said.

He was not injured.

Connor and several others recalled the lights going off on impact.

Some relatives of people who daily take Train 917, which leaves South Station at 4:40 p.m. bound for Stoughton, went to the scene looking for them.

Debbie Hildred of Canton was looking for her son, Ryan Carpenter, 26, concerned because he had not called her on his cell phone.

Stanley Gay of Stoughton, his 2-year-old son, Arthur, in his arms, was looking for his wife, Leynad. He had no way of reaching her because they do not have cell phones.

The injured went to Caritas Norwood Hospital, Milton Hospital and Caritas Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton.

Most of the 43 people taken to Norwood were treated and released for "very minor injuries," said Mary Wallan, a hospital spokeswoman.

About 10 people arrived by ambulance, but most were taken to the hospital on an MBTA bus.

One person was admitted to the hospital for observation.

Families arrived while the injured waited in long emergency room lines as reinforced ranks of doctors and nurses attempted to treat them quickly.

Rebecca Sullivan of Canton arrived at the hospital to check on her mother, Mary Ellen Gleason, who was among the first to arrive by ambulance.

Sullivan said her mother was stunned silent after the crash, then broke down crying when they spoke on the phone.

Sullivan said her mother likely broke her nose on the seat in front of her, but was otherwise OK.

Commuter rail service on the Stoughton line was restored by about 8 p.m.
 
Last edited:
Boston station WCVB reports that the engineer of the MBTA's No. 917 train on the Providence/Stoughton line saw a boxcar rolling on the tracks toward them, stopped the train and ran into the first passenger car shouting to people to brace themselves for the collision.
Approximately 50 passengers and crew received minor injuries, and about 10 people were taken to area hospitals, a spokesman for the MBTA said. About 100 passengers were on board the train at the time of the crash. The train left Boston's South Station at 4:40 p.m.
It is unclear if the CSX freight car was parked on the tracks, or how it ended up rolling onto the same track on which the southbound commuter train was traveling. The rail line is maintained and controlled by Amtrak.
The MBTA suspended the Providence/Stoughton rail service after the crash, and passengers were bused between stations.
The freight car was filled with lumber.
MBTAaccident1.png

MBTAaccident2.png

MBTAaccident3.png

MBTAaccident4.png

MBTAaccident5.png

MBTAaccident7.png

BostonWCVBTVDT.png

The engineer's story..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wkb-e2i9f1k
 
Gandalf, some of your information is false. About forty (40) people were taken to area hospitals. You can see video and hear Audio, as Rick said above, of the actual transmissions between the engine and dispatcher at our GAURC website. (http://gaurc.us/)
 
Gandalf, some of your information is false. About forty (40) people were taken to area hospitals. You can see video and hear Audio, as Rick said above, of the actual transmissions between the engine and dispatcher at our GAURC website. (http://gaurc.us/)
Sorry,I didn't write it...this was an earlier report before all the injuries were known....;)
Edit: It is also known for the news to screw stuff up ;)
 
Last edited:
They should start installing brakes on the freight cars. At least when they're parked they can't go anywhere.
 
i thought there was mandate that all rolling stock had to have reverse air systems
i could be wrong
 
That car should have had its brakes in full lock down without an engine to pump up air. Air brakes release when pressure is forced into the brake system, I the pressure is released (such as having a severed air hose) the system is SUPPOSED to be fail-safe and lock up the brakes. However somthing went wrong here.
 
ya thats what i thought
the only way that car could have rolled is if the air was bottled in the line
which would be human error
 
''Check, double check, triple check, and quadruple check.'' That's my motto. The brakes should have been 100% working.
 
ya thats what i thought
the only way that car could have rolled is if the air was bottled in the line
which would be human error
Yup, This could have only happened if: The car had a kink in the air hoses on BOTH ends of the car BEFORE the crew dropped it off, (otherwise the air would have leaked out and applyed the brakes) Then somthing had to give it enough of a shove to counter its weight (newton's law) and then it had to gain momentum, somthing just went really wrong here (OR the railroad was playing stupid and not repairing the air resievor in the car and it failed.)
 
Gandalf, some of your information is false. About forty (40) people were taken to area hospitals. You can see video and hear Audio, as Rick said above, of the actual transmissions between the engine and dispatcher at our GAURC website. (http://gaurc.us/)

There is a link to the radio traffic recording at the top of my original post, below the scene photo.

~Rick
 
Yup, This could have only happened if: The car had a kink in the air hoses on BOTH ends of the car BEFORE the crew dropped it off, (otherwise the air would have leaked out and applyed the brakes) Then somthing had to give it enough of a shove to counter its weight (newton's law) and then it had to gain momentum, somthing just went really wrong here (OR the railroad was playing stupid and not repairing the air resievor in the car and it failed.)

if the conductor closed the air valves before the engineer drained the air in the line the air would be bottled and it could take days or weeks for the air to bleed off.
 
Back
Top