"but at 75 m.p.h started a 'tipsy' side motion that many times scared crews"
Okay, chanced to get the PRR E6 4-4-2 written for 2004 working in 2009.
And that by luck, not by knowledge.
Hauling along 4 of the TOC wooden passenger cars, normal load for a 4-4-2, she was topping out at 69mph.
Needs to go faster - A. because I want it to, it is a passenger loco.
B. because they really did do more than 60-something MPH.
By quite a bit.
Quite a bit.
A way that can be handled by someone who has never before tinkered with stuff like that?
--> Any chance the fellow who designed it could do an update including that tipsy side motion?
Okay, chanced to get the PRR E6 4-4-2 written for 2004 working in 2009.
And that by luck, not by knowledge.
Hauling along 4 of the TOC wooden passenger cars, normal load for a 4-4-2, she was topping out at 69mph.
Needs to go faster - A. because I want it to, it is a passenger loco.
B. because they really did do more than 60-something MPH.
By quite a bit.
Quite a bit.
Is there a way to increase its top speed?Alvin F. Staufer in PENNSY POWER, c.
""PUREST OF THE PURE, PRIDE OF THE FLEET". The E6s Atlantics were everybody's favorite, even though none ever had stokers, feedwater heaters, or power reverses.
Bud Rothar got this quote from an E6s engineer, "nicest had fired engines ever built. Speed Queens rode beautifully, but at 75 m.p.h started a 'tipsy' side motion that many times scared crews,as they felt top heavy. Once up to 80 m.p.h., they settled back down and could keep right on climbing with no effect on riding quality. They were very easy on coal and water, and were the pace-setters for timetable operations"
A way that can be handled by someone who has never before tinkered with stuff like that?
--> Any chance the fellow who designed it could do an update including that tipsy side motion?