Another Amtrak classic route is in financial jeopardy

Amtrak and passenger rail does well in smaller regional areas. Up here in eastern New England, we now have the Downeaster which connects Boston to Portland, now Brunswick, Maine. When NARP was working on restoring the service, the naysayers came out in full force to knock it down. It was going to cost money, lose money, not carry any passengers, their taunts went on and on. PanAm Rys even got in on the act and fought the track upgrades needed on the Boston to Portland portion of the line. Eventually the service started, and this has proven to be an extremely popular service both for daily commuters as well as tourists. There is rarely an empty seat, and reservations are required during the summer tourist months.

With it's popularity increasing, there are even thoughts and discussions going on about expanding the service to Augusta, Maine and perhaps then beyond. In the same region, where the DE runs, there are even thoughts and discussions, as well as some track improvements and rebuilding going on, to restore service from Portland to the White Mountains, perhaps up to St. Johnsbury, VT again, and or use the St. Lawrence and Atlantic and run via Bethel, and Gorham, and Berlin, NH to Montreal. These routes, some inactive since the mid-1980s, haven't seen passenger service in close to 50 or more years. The region, however, has become popular with tourists due to the scenic views and majestic mountains.

Will this happen? We don't know, but with increasing fuel costs (anyone else notice the 40-cent boost recently), this might be the only way to save the economies of some of the more remote regions in the US. We are already seeing increased freight service along our railroads up here, a much needed service improvement, as freight is moving to trains and off the badly maintained and crowded interstates in the region.

Again, these trains aren't the 3,000 mile long distance trains, but more regional 600-900 mile routes which can be a bear to drive, especially with tourists clogging the roads, and bad weather.

John
 
I want to give the prspective of a person who lives on the northeast. I believe that the best way to increase Amtrak's ridership on Long Distance Trains are the following, increase train service intervals. We here in the Northeast know there will always be a train running somewhere at any time of day. Even if it is 3 in the morning, the next train to leave NYC to Washington or to New Jersey leaves at 5. As most will say history repeats itself, and that time is now with train travel.
 
I would say the Downeaster is atypical, it is really the NE Corridor growing.

It sure is and this is due to the region marketing the service as well. The frequency of the trains could be better but then again they have to contend with single track and a less than cooperative freight company. Guilford, now PanAm isn't a friendly company to deal with, at least historically. They ruined the Connecticut River main so that the Vermonter had terrible service due to bad track conditions. Eventually, the train was rerouted via the New England Central, then Central Vermont, to remove it from the old B&M trackage. When the Downeaster was being started, Guilford brought Amtrak and NARP to court to fight about the track upgrades! They didn't want the 79 mph tracks due to some very lame excuses which I can't recall. Eventually, Amtrak and NARP won the battle and the project continued. In part I think the battle ensued because PanAm felt the passenger service was competing with their airline. Yes, the deplorable railroad was running the old airline under their own name again. The airline has since closed due to safety issues, I can't imagine why given their lack of maintenance of their equipment and railroad, and the Downeaster has survived quite well.

John
 
The American passenger train is all but dead. Amtrak provides (in my opinion) subpar service on most routes (the Acela being the exception), the trains are almost always late...


Amtrak isn't much of a pain. As for the subpar service, they do the best they can with what they have. All the Michigan Service trains (with the exception of the Pere Marquette) have exceptional comfort and are almost always on time. I can't say for other services because I only see the Michigan Services, but with the upgrades in the area service is only going to improve.
 
Amtrak isn't much of a pain. As for the subpar service, they do the best they can with what they have. All the Michigan Service trains (with the exception of the Pere Marquette) have exceptional comfort and are almost always on time. I can't say for other services because I only see the Michigan Services, but with the upgrades in the area service is only going to improve.

I'm pretty sure the MARP reported that 371/370 were permanently assigned Superliners and an NPCU. Info dated 2011ish??? Although I must say the Horizon cars are pretty comfortable too.
 
I'm pretty sure the MARP reported that 371/370 were permanently assigned Superliners and an NPCU. Info dated 2011ish??? Although I must say the Horizon cars are pretty comfortable too.

Yeah I don't know much about 370/371.

Quoted from Wikipedia:

"... The railroads' dispatching practices were investigated in 2008, resulting in stricter laws about train priority which had a dramatic result. Amtrak's overall on-time performance went up from 74.7% in fiscal 2008 to 84.7% in 2009..."

Amtrak on-time performance has gone up dramatically since 2008, as well as ridership. Seems to me that Amtrak DEFINITELY isn't a pain.
 
Back
Top