3 Wheel Bogies

dricketts

Trainz Luvr since 2004
What are the advantages of three wheel bogies? Specifically heavyweight coaches. I thought of the overall weight of the coach but 86ft boxcars have two wheel bogies.
 
What are the advantages of three wheel bogies? Specifically heavyweight coaches. I thought of the overall weight of the coach but 86ft boxcars have two wheel bogies.

And you can certainly put a heck of a lot more weight in an 86' boxcar than a bunch of people in a coach!

Maybe they ride smoother? I drive a truck for a living, and aside from the fact that a tandem axle can physically carry more weight than a single axle, a tandem gives a much smoother ride. If you hit a speed bump or a pothole with a single axle it is MUCH more noticeable than a wheel going through the hole while the other wheel in the tandem set is supporting part of the load.

I can imagine a 3-axle bogey with each axle carrying 1/3 of the weight of the end of the car hitting rail joints wouldn't transmit as much of the jolt into the car.

Certainly not a scientific answer, but it makes sense. Anyone with a better idea?

---Scott
 
While the payload of an 85 foot heavyweight car weighs a lot less than the payload of a modern box or hopper car, the overall weight of the heavyweight cars was, in many cases, greater. Heavyweight cars were ballasted with poured concrete floors, and their total weight could run to well over 65 tons, especially dining and tavern cars that required exceptional stability for passenger comfort. Sleepers and coaches generally ran about 65 tons.

The reason for this is that the technology of trucks was relatively undeveloped in comparison to modern passenger trucks. The only way to stabilize the cars and make them comfortable riding was to weigh them down and meant that 12 wheels were needed to support the weight. Improvements in the riding qualities of the trucks were what made lightweight cars, streamliners, possible, because the cars could be made lighter but still ride comfortably. Standard suburban, or commute, cars, on the other hand, did not make particularly long runs, so the passengers could tolerate the rougher ride that these lighter cars, around half the weight of the long haul heavyweights, provided the passengers. Big difference between riding for a half hour or even an hour and riding for three days.

I've ridden both types of cars, commuting for years on standard suburban cars and riding several times on heavyweight Harriman coaches in my younger days and the difference in ride was remarkable.

Bernie

Edit: It occurs to me that my memory of the weight I mention, 65 tons, may be off a bit, but the principal was that the heavier the car the smoother the ride. The tare was many times the weight of the payload and the extra wheels were required by the overall weight.
 
Last edited:
Great info Bernie. Thanks.

I wonder if the excessive weight of the cars caused havoc on track, bridges, and the loco power.
 
No, it would not except on the flimsiest of roadbeds. That was the reason why the cars ran on six wheel trucks. By spreading the load over four extra wheels per car, abnormal wear on the track was avoided. Naturally, the extra weight affected the amount of horsepower needed to move the train, which is one of the reasons why high stepping Atlantics and Pacifics were quickly relegated to secondary status with the advent of the steel heavyweights, and gave way to Mountains and Northerns and some of the passenger monster locos built by the Pennsy. My own favorite RR, Espee, ran its crack Overland behind articulated Cab Forwards over the Sierras during the heavyweight era because the TE and horsepower were needed to haul the heavy trains.

Bernie
 
Last edited:
No, it would not except on the flimsiest of roadbeds. That was the reason why the cars ran on six wheel trucks. By spreading the load over four extra wheels per car, abnormal wear on the track was avoided. Naturally, the extra weight affected the amount of horsepower needed to move the train, which is one of the reasons why high stepping Atlantics and Pacifics were quickly relegated to secondary status with the advent of the steel heavyweights, and gave way to Mountains and Northerns and some of the passenger monster locos built by the Pennsy. My own favorite RR, Espee, ran its crack Overland behind articulated Cab Forwards over the Sierras during the heavyweight era because the TE and horsepower were needed to haul the heavy trains.

Bernie

and the SP used the 4-8-2/ and there heavier pacifics they had for the San Joaquin Daylight and sunset limited which were fairly flatland routes
 
It has to do with axle loading (weight per axle). A 60 ton car on 4-wheel bogeys has 15 tons on each axle. With 6-wheel bogeys its 10 tons. The more weight per axle the heavier the rail must be (measured in pounds per yard). Too much weight on too light a rail damages the rail. The tender of the ATSF 2-10-4 used 4 axle bogeys. Centipede tenders like those on the Challenger and Big Boy have 7 axles. All for the same reason - - - spread the weight and lower axle loading.

Ben
 
Back
Top