Locomotive type question

HI! it's me again!

I wanted to ask you guys a few things so I was wondering....

I've notice that a K4 type pacific #5038 does exsist...


& there is a P10 on the union pacific & locomotives very similar on the southern pacific...


But I need to know. Were there any types of locomotive resembeling the American 10 wheeler of the AT&SF as well as American 4-4-0 #724 from the Pennsylvania?

American 10 (TRS2004)

American (TRS2004)

Cause I tried to fing photographs of the two in real life & so far, no sucess.

Do you know if models like those exsist?

That is all.

Google Santa Fe 4-6-0, first thing that comes up is very similar to the 4-6-0

tycoonk4, do you mean something like this?


Is this what you meant?

http://www.railroadheritage.org/index.php?P=FullRecord&ResourceId=151

A Santa Fe 4-6-0.

Thanks for the photo Euphod.

As far as I looked up the closest I've come to find is a class 10 that apparently matches the 10 wheeler.
link is here: http://www.steamlocomotive.com/ten-wheeler/?page=atsf

What about the PRR 4-4-0? It looks like a D16 class 4-4-0 but heavly modified with parts from baldwin and other manufacturers.

It's been a couple of years since I last responded here, so I'm gonna say this.

It about the P10 itself. The locomotives both designated P10 on the union pacific & on the southern pacific looks so similar to each other perhaps even identical looking to one of another.

So I have to say this, is the locomotive above from the union pacific or the southern pacific or a hybrid of both?

That's its from me.

NTSEFAN said:

It's been a couple of years since I last responded here, so I'm gonna say this.

It about the P10 itself. The locomotives both designated P10 on the union pacific & on the southern pacific looks so similar to each other perhaps even identical looking to one of another.

So I have to say this, is the locomotive above from the union pacific or the southern pacific or a hybrid of both?

That's its from me.

Click to expand...

Both lines used designs that may have been almost identical at one time or another, primarily due to corporate ownership, ie, E H Harriman. Hence, cost savings in standard designs. Similar situation on the Van Sweringen lines, particularly the Berks.

On an unrelated note, is Euphod still around? Haven't heard from him in quite a while.

kws4000 said:

Both lines used designs that may have been almost identical at one time or another, primarily due to corporate ownership, ie, E H Harriman. Hence, cost savings in standard designs. Similar situation on the Van Sweringen lines, particularly the Berks.

On an unrelated note, is Euphod still around? Haven't heard from him in quite a while.

Click to expand...

I was wondering why was it. Thanks for it.

Beats me. Not sure.