JonMyrlennBailey
Active member
On a figure 8 model mainline layout, with several track marks to direct the trains around in (hopefully) one direction, AI will come to a red signal and then stupidly back the train up instead of just holding for this red signal as a real-world train would or should. This is because a closed loop mainline (common in MODEL RR layouts) provides TWO possible paths to a given mainline track mark specified in a schedule of commands.
What if I were to get clever and FOOL AI?
What if BEHIND this red signal, I were to place an invisible signal (facing in the opposite direction) about 100 to 200 feet behind the forward visible signal on the line. This visible forward signal is the signal I want the train to hold for with no backups. Also, a trigger would be placed in between the visible signal and the invisible signal facing the opposite direction toward the rear of the train. The train would be in the range of the trigger so that reversing signal remains red as long as the train occupies it. The train, in theory would be pickled in between two red signals and couldn't move anywhere until the forward signal becomes clear.
The Trigger Multiple Signals rule would be rigged to create this sort of 'clamping' (anti-reverse) signal to force the train to stay put.
Would this work in theory?
I am going to try it out.
What if I were to get clever and FOOL AI?
What if BEHIND this red signal, I were to place an invisible signal (facing in the opposite direction) about 100 to 200 feet behind the forward visible signal on the line. This visible forward signal is the signal I want the train to hold for with no backups. Also, a trigger would be placed in between the visible signal and the invisible signal facing the opposite direction toward the rear of the train. The train would be in the range of the trigger so that reversing signal remains red as long as the train occupies it. The train, in theory would be pickled in between two red signals and couldn't move anywhere until the forward signal becomes clear.
The Trigger Multiple Signals rule would be rigged to create this sort of 'clamping' (anti-reverse) signal to force the train to stay put.
Would this work in theory?
I am going to try it out.
Last edited: